Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Here's the full question:
Strolling through the city park late at night, we saw several young couples walking their dogs, as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts. Choose the selection in which the sentence is properly punctuated. A) NO CHANGE B) Strolling through the city park late at night, we saw several young couples walking their dogs as well as, a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts. C) Strolling through the city park late at night, we saw several young couples, walking their dogs as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts. D) Strolling through the city park late at night we saw several young couples walking their dogs as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts.
The answer is A, no change.
This is simply because the other options are not correct in English.
Option B: the second comma is wrongly placed.
Option C: Also a wrongly placed second comma. This creates an unnecessarily long statement with no white space or pause.
Option D: lacks punctuation.
This question is missing the option. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Strolling through the city park late at night, we saw several young couples walking their dogs, as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts.
Choose the selection in which the sentence is properly punctuated.
a) NO CHANGE
b) Strolling through the city park late at night, we saw several young couples walking their dogs as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts.
c) Strolling through the city park late at night, we saw several young couples, walking their dogs as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts.
d) Strolling through the city park late at night we saw several young couples walking their dogs as well as a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts.
Answer:
The correct option is a) NO CHANGE.
Explanation:
The sentence is properly punctuated the way it is, so there is no need to change it. The sentence starts with a participial phrase, which must be followed by a comma. Then, we have the main clause. Notice that the verb in the main clause has two direct objects: "several young couples walking their dogs" and "a whole bunch of squirrels scurrying about seeking nuts". Since those two objects are very long, it is appropriate to place a comma before the adverb introducing the second object - "as well as." That will avoid problems in reading and interpreting what words belong to each object. Therefore, the sentence does not need any changes in punctuation.
one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.
one should attack premises that are not important to the argument
one should point out the failings of its author
Answer:
When disagreeing with a premise, . one should have reasons in place that demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.
Explanation:
b. dynamic
c. conflicted
d. climactic
the answer would be C. "The river Thames," he explained, "is spanned by the famous Tower Bridge."
please mark as brainliest if you want <3
The names of the previous lodgers familiar to Billy are of famous historical figures who were involved in criminal activities and were hanged. They include people like Burke and Hare.
The names of the previous lodgers are familiar to Billy because they are famous historical figures. These people seem to have a common trait of being involved in criminal activities, as Billy's previous lodgers have all been hanged. For example, the names of two previous lodgers mentioned in the story are Burke and Hare, who were infamous for killing people to sell their bodies for anatomical studies.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Figurative Language
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is (D.
Explanation:
d. They could go with Delilah, Jim, or Elaine; and Debby, Sandra, and Lynn could go with us.