Maddy's cross-price elasticity of demand for beans and rice is -1, and they are complements.
The cross-price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded of one good to a change in the price of another good. It is calculated as the percentage change in the quantity demanded of one good divided by the percentage change in the price of the other good. In this case, Maddy's cross-price elasticity of demand for beans and rice can be calculated using the formula:
Cross-Price Elasticity = ((Q2 - Q1) / (Q1)) / ((P2 - P1) / (P1))
Calculating the values:
Q1 = 2 pounds of beans per month
Q2 = 1 pounds of beans per month
P1 = $2 per pound of beans
P2 = $3 per pound of beans
Substituting the values into the formula:
Cross-Price Elasticity = ((1 - 2) / (2)) / ((3 - 2) / (2)) = -0.5 / 0.5 = -1
The cross-price elasticity of demand for beans and rice is -1, which indicates that they are complementary goods. When the price of beans increases, the quantity demanded of beans decreases, and as a result, Maddy purchases less rice as well.
#SPJ3
b. $1.2062
c. $1.1964
d. $1.2286
Answer: c. $1.1964
Explanation:
The Expected Rate is calculated as follows,
Expected Rate = ((1+ Australia inflation rate)/(1+ U.S inflation rate)) *spot rate
Plugging in the figures therefore we will have,
Expected Rate = ((1+0.033) / (1 + 0.028)) * 1.1904
Expected Rate = $1.1964
$1.1964 is the expected exchange rate one year from now if relative purchasing power parity exists.
Answer:
Expected exchange rate $1 = A$1.1962
Explanation:
The purchasing power parity theory states the future spot rate and and he current spot exchange rate between two currencies can be linked to the relative inflation rate between the two currencies. This also known as the law of one price.
The model is given as follows:
S = So× (1+Fc)/(1+Fh)
Fc - inflation rate in Australia - 3.3
Fh- Inflation rate in the US- 2.8
S- Future spot rate- ?
So- Current spot rate- A$1.1904
Expected exchange rate one year from now
= 1.1904× (1.033)/(1.028)
= 1.19618
= A$1.1962
Answer:
a) If the homeowner has the $6000 available for the project, what would the cost of electricity from the power company need to be greater than ($/kW-hr) to make the project viable if other investments are providing 8% interest. ($0.0545/kW-hr)
we can use the present value of an annuity formula:
PV = monthly savings x annuity factor
monthly savings = $6,000 / 129.52005 = $46.3249
price of kW-hr = $46.3249 / 850 = $0.054499851 ≈ $0.0545
b) If the homeowner had to borrow the $6000 from the bank at 5% interest for 10 years (monthly payments) what would the cost of electricity need to be greater than in $/kWhr from the power company to make the project viable if other investments are providing 8% interest. ($0.0476/kW-hr)
the monthly payment to cover the loan = PV / annuity factor
monthly payment = $6,000 / 94.28033 = $63.64
price of kW-hr = $63.64 / 850 = $0.074870588 ≈ $0.0749
b) false
Answer:b) false
Explanation:
They would not want to stock up on something that the market price will decline significantly on, they would do the opposite
Answer:
False
Explanation:
This is false, they would want to do the opposite, not stock up
B. Real estate prices in Miami will fall, real estate prices in Chicago will fall.
C. Real estate prices in Miami will rise, real estate prices in Chicago will rise.
D. Real estate prices in Miami will fall, real estate prices in Chicago will rise.
E. None of the above.
Answer:
D. Real estate prices in Miami will fall, real estate prices in Chicago will rise.
Explanation:
Real estate prices in Miami will fall because according to the model, climate change will lower the amenity value of the local climate. This means that climate change will make the climate of Miami less desirable for potential residents, causing a drop in the price of the real estate of the city due to less demand.
Chicago on the other hand, will have the amenity level of its climate increased, and this will attract more potential residents who will drive up demand, causing Chicago's real estate prices to rise.
B. "Report any differences on the enclosed statement directly to our auditors; no reply is necessary if this amount agrees with your records"
C. "If you do not report any differences with 15 days, it will be assumed that this statement is correct"
D. "The following invoices have been selected for confirmation and represent amounts that are overdue"
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": "If you do not report any differences with 15 days, it will be assumed that this statement is correct".
Explanation:
Accounts Receivable, or AR, is an accounting term used to refer to the money that is owed to a company by its customers. The customers, who may be individuals or corporations, are the debtors since they owe money for the goods or services provided by the company. When the product is sold in credit the company sets a number of days so that the customer can pay the bill amount. The term usually is 30, 60 or 90 days.
In that sense, and auditor may find 15 days suitable for a debtor for report changes in a statement, otherwise, it is considered as correct.
Answer:
France
Germany
Explanation:
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
France has a lower opportunity cost in the production of olives compared to Germany.
It means that Germany would have a lower opportunity cost in the production of fish when compared to France.
I hope my answer helps you
France has a comparative advantage in the production of olives because it gives up less fish to produce them than Germany does. Conversely, Germany has a comparative advantage in fish production as it sacrifices less to produce fish than olives.
Comparative advantage is an economic concept that identifies the goods a country can produce in a cost-effective way compared to other countries. In the scenario where France's opportunity cost for producing one crate of olives is 4 pounds of fish and Germany's opportunity cost for the same crate of olives is 10 pounds of fish, we can deduce that France has a comparative advantage in olive production and Germany has a comparative advantage in fish production since it gives up less to produce the same amount of fish as opposed to olives.
#SPJ3