Answer:
$6,200
Explanation:
Beginning Work in progress $15,000 $8,000
Units started $60,000 $38,500
Total process $75,000 $46,500
Less: Units transferred to tax $65,000
Ending work in progress $10,000
Average cost method material cost of work in progress = Material cost ÷ Total units
$46,500 ÷ $75,000
= $0.62
Material cost of work in progress = $0.62 × $10,000
= $6,200
In April, Plemmon Company started with $8000 worth of materials and used $38500 over the month. 65,000 units were completed, leaving 10,000 units still in process. The materials cost of these remaining units, calculated using the average cost method, is $6,200.
To find the material cost of work in process at April 30 using the average cost method, we first need to calculate the total cost of material used throughout April, which includes both the cost of materials from initial work in process and the materials started during the month. That gives us the sum of $8,000 and $38,500, amounting to $46,500 in total materials cost. Since 65,000 units were completed and transferred out during April, this means 10,000 units (75,000 units at the start and started during April - 65,000 units completed) remain in work in process at the end of April. Average cost per unit is calculated as total cost divided by total units, giving us $46,500 divided by 75,000 units, which equals $0.62 per unit. The material cost of work in process at April 30 is thus 10,000 units times $0.62, giving a result of $6,200.
#SPJ3
Answer:
C. $400,000
Explanation:
The computation of the gross profit is shown below:
Gross profit = Net Sales - costs of goods sold
= $500,000 - $100,000
= $400,000
For determining the gross profit, we deduct the costs of goods sold from the net sales, so that the true value can come. It is shown in the income statement
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
a. 1.67 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is shown below:
In year 0 = $1,000
In year 1 = $500
In year 2 = $750
If we take the only year 1 cash inflow i.e $500
Now we deduct the $500 from the $1,000, so the amount would be $500
And, the next year cash inflow is $750
So, the payback period equal to
= 1 years + $500 ÷ $750
= 1.67 years
Answer:
8.30% is the rate of interest with continuous compounding is equivalent to 8% per annum with monthly compounding
Explanation:
Per annual rate = r = 8% = 0.08
Numer of compounding = m
Compounding Interest rate = ( ( 1 + r / m )^m ) - 1
Compounding Interest rate = ( ( 1 + 0.08 / 12 )^12 ) - 1
Compounding Interest rate = 0.0829995
Compounding Interest rate = 0.083
Compounding Interest rate = 8.30%
So, 8.30% is the rate of interest with continuous compounding is equivalent to 8% per annum with monthly compounding.
Income from continuing operations is $61,011 $41,226
Current Year Previous Year
Revenues:
Admissions 20.28≅ 20.3 20.81 ≅20.8
Event-related revenue 29.61 ≅ 29.6 30.32≅30.3
NASCAR broadcasting revenue 43.80≅ 43.8 42.82≅42.8
Other operating revenue 6.31 ≅ 6.3 6.05≅6.1
Total revenues 100% 100%
Expenses and other:
Direct expense of events 21.01 ≅ 21.0 21.10≅ 21.1
NASCAR event management fees 29.61≅ 29.6 26.48≅ 26.5
Other direct expenses 3.94 ≅ 3.9 3.82≅3.8
General and administrative 35.84 ≅ 35.8 40.08≅40.1
Total expenses and other 87.72 ≅ 87.7 91.49≅ 91.5
Income from continuing operations 12.23% 8.51%
Vertical Analysis =(Income Statement Item/ Sales )*100
We prepared a comparative income statement for these two years in vertical form, stating each item as a percent of revenues.
Current Year Previous Year
Revenues:
Admissions $100,694 $100,798
Event-related revenue 146,980 146,849
NASCAR broadcasting revenue 217,469 207,369
Other operating revenue 31,320 29,293
Total revenues $496,463 $484,309
Expenses and other:
Direct expense of events $104,303 $102,196
NASCAR event management fees 133,682 128,254
Other direct expenses 19,541 18,513
General and administrative 177,926 194,120
Total expenses and other $435,452 $443,083
Income from continuing operations $61,011 $41,226
The complete question is Vertical Analysis of Income Statement The following comparative income statement (in thousands of dollars) for two recent fiscal years was adapted from the annual report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc., owner and operator of several major motor speedways, such as the Atlanta, Texas, and Las Vegas Motor Speedways. Current Year Previous Year Revenues: Admissions $100,694 $100,798 Event-related revenue 146,980 146,849 NASCAR broadcasting revenue 217,469 207,369 Other operating revenue 31,320 29,293 Total revenues $496,463 $484,309 Expenses and other: Direct expense of events $104,303 $102,196 NASCAR event management fees 133,682 128,254 Other direct expenses 19,541 18,513 General and administrative 177,926 194,120 Total expenses and other $435,452 $443,083 Income from continuing operations $61,011 $41,226 a. Prepare a comparative income statement for these two years in vertical form, stating each item as a percent of revenues. Enter all amounts as positive numbers. (Note: Due to rounding, amounts may not total 100%). Round your percentages to one decimal place.
To learn more about income statement refer to:
#SPJ4
The comparative income statement for Speedway motorsports Inc. over several fiscal years gives insights into revenue, costs, and profit trends. Increasing revenues coupled with increasing costs might indicate a need for cost efficiency, while a higher rate of profit growth compared to revenues could suggest effective cost management.
The question refers to a comparative income statement of Speedway Motorsports, Inc., a major operator of motor speedways. A comparative income statement compares the income statements of a company across several fiscal years. This can provide valuable insights into how revenues, costs, and profits are developing over time, and thus give indications of how the company's business model is working and where there might be room for improvements.
For example, if Speedway Motorsports' income statements show increasing revenues but also increasing costs, it might indicate that they need to work on cost efficiency. Alternatively, if profits are increasing faster than revenues, it could suggest that their cost management is effective.
#SPJ12
If Louvers, Inc., accepted a $15,000, 180-day, 10 percent note from a customer on May 31. The necessary June 30 adjusting entry for Louvers will be:
Debit Interest receivable $125
Credit Interest revenue $125
Louvers, Inc. Adjusting Journal entry
Debit Interest receivable $125
Credit Interest revenue $125
($15,000 × 10% × 30/360)
(To record interest receivable)
The Interest amount of $125 calculated as ($15,000 × 10% × 30/360) is due at maturity. Between May 31 and June30, a total of 30 days passed.
Inconclusion the necessary June 30 adjusting entry for Louvers will be:
Debit Interest receivable $125
Credit Interest revenue $125
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20397637
Answer:
Interest receivable
To Interest revenue
(Being the interest receivable is recorded)
Explanation:
The adjusting entry is as follows
Interest receivable
To Interest revenue
(Being the interest receivable is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
= Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ (total number of days in a year)
= $15,000 × 10% × (30 days ÷ 360 days)
= $125
The 30 days is calculated from May 31 to June 30
Answer:
jury of executive opinion.
Explanation:
The forecasting technique that pools the opinions of a group of experts or managers is known as jury of executive opinion.
For example, when XYZ manufacturing company decides to conduct a series of strategic meetings for its forecasting by involving its key employees such as directors, analysts, managers etc to discuss (gathering opinions, ideas, perspectives and views) before reaching a forecasting consensus. This is simply a jury of executive opinion.
The forecasting technique that combines the opinions of a group of experts or managers is known as the 'jury of executive opinion'. It leverages collective expertise for prediction in complex decision-making situations or when there's a lack of sufficient hard data.
The forecasting technique that gathers and combines the views and opinions of a group of experts or managers is called the Jury of executive opinion. This technique relies on the collective knowledge, experience, and intuition of a group of high-level managers to predict future events or outcomes. It's often used in situations where decision-making is complex, or when there aren't enough hard data available. For instance, a group of corporate executives could use their combined expertise to make forecasts about trends in their industry, the potential impact of significant new legislation, or the likely behavior of their competitors.
#SPJ3