Answer:
1,212,723 shares
Explanation:
Given that,
Value of issuing preferred stock = $33,000,000
Discount rate = 11.87%
Dividend paid = $3.23
Price of preferred stock:
= Annual dividend ÷ discount rate
= $3.23 ÷ 0.1187
= $27.2115
Shares will they need to issue:
= Value of issuing preferred stock ÷ Price of preferred stock
= $33,000,000 ÷ $27.2115
= 1,212,723
Answer:
The present value is $19,039
Explanation:
The computation of the Present value is shown below
= Present value of all yearly cash inflows after applying discount factor
The discount factor should be computed by
= 1 ÷ (1 + rate) ^ years
where,
rate is 2%
Year = 0,1,2,3,4 and so on
Discount Factor:
For Year 1 = 1 ÷ 1.02^1 = 0.9804
For Year 2 = 1 ÷ 1.02^2 = 0.9612
For Year 3 = 1 ÷ 1.02^3 = 0.9423
For Year 4 = 1 ÷ 1.02^4 = 0.9238
So, the calculation of a Present value of all yearly cash inflows are shown below
= (Year 1 cash inflow × Present Factor of Year 1) + (Year 2 cash inflow × Present Factor of Year 2) + (Year 3 cash inflow × Present Factor of Year 3) + (Year 4 cash inflow × Present Factor of Year 4)
= ($5,000 × 0.9804) + ($5,000 × 0.9612) + ($5,000 × 0.9423) + ($5,000 × 0.9238)
= $4,901.96 + $4,805.84 + $4,711.61 + $4,619.23
= $19,039
We take the first four digits of the discount factor.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": False.
Explanation:
Kantian ethics, named after Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), propose that actions such as theft or lying are absolutely forbidden even when the action brings the individual certain level of happiness. The Utilitarian Approach pursues obtaining maximum satisfaction by minimizing harm. Though, that minimal harm is subjective since it could represent greater harm for the individuals affected.
Thus, in both Kantian and utilitarian approaches ethical wrong is committed by deceiving consumers, producers, and the overall market efficiency.
Answer:
Cycle Time = 10.19482 minute
Explanation:
From the question :
The Model E can be illustrated perfectly as shown below:
Process Time Required Predecessor Task Learning Rate
per Unit
A 9 82
B 12 A 86
C 18 B 81
D 9 C 90
E 12 D 80
F 17 E 88
G 14 F 83
H 12 G 85
I 8 H 82
Now For the minutes per week for each Process; we have :
Process Time Required Predecessor Learning Minutes
per Unit Task Rate (Week 16)
A 9 82 4.069096
B 12 A 86 6.564098
C 18 B 81 7.74841
D 9 C 90 5.9049
E 12 D 80 4.9152
F 17 E 88 10.19482
G 14 F 83 6.644165
H 12 G 85 6.264075
I 8 H 82 3.616974
The objective here is to determine the expected Cycle Time for Model E in Week 16
So, we can equally regard the Cycle Time = Bottleneck of Activity for Week 16.
Cycle Time = 10.19482 minute in as much as it is the the largest activity time for the week 16
Given that the demand per week is : = 247
The available time per week = 40 hours = 40 × 60 hours = 2400 minutes
Talk Time = Available Time Per Week/Demand Per Week
Talk Time = 2400/247
Talk Time = 9.716599
Thus; here the cycle time is greater than the talk time.
shows a zero balance.
has been underapplied.
has been overapplied.
Answer:
has been overapplied.
Explanation:
The net balance of debit and credit of manufacturing overhead account is under or over applied overhead. On debit sides the Actual costs incurred is recorded and overhead applied is recorded in credit side of manufacturing overhead account. Total actual costs are $82,000 ( $30,000 + $24,000 + $28,000 ) and overhead applied is $86,000. Net balance of account is overapplied overhead of $4,000 ( $86,000 - $82,000 ).
Answer:
I agree with that, because all of them have good bussiness ideas.
Even though a general partnership might work for Alice, Betty, and Cathy, a limited liability company (LLC) or a corporation might be more appropriate due to Alice's wealth, Betty's business knowledge, and Cathy's valuable scientific process. This way, they can better protect their individual assets, as well as the venture's funding and potential expansion.
While a general partnership might seem like a viable solution for Alice, Betty, and Cathy, it may not be the most optimal choice considering their individual circumstances and contributions. In a general partnership, every partner shares liability and financial commitment equally or according to their investment. Although this may initially seem fair, it might put Alice at risk since she's contributing the most financially. Instead, I'd recommend considering a limited liability company (LLC) or corporation.
In an LLC, Alice, Betty, and Cathy can limit their personal liabilities. This would allow Alice to protect her wealth while still contributing to the venture. In a corporation, the company is considered a separate legal entity. This structure can also be beneficial if they plan on seeking outside venture capital or looking into other ambitious expansion.
Remember, the final decision depends on various factors including tax considerations, business goals, and the level of desired legal protection. It is advisable to consult with a business advisor or attorney before deciding.
#SPJ2