Answer: Product-differentiation
Explanation: Product-differentiation strategy is a marketing technique that seeks to differentiate an organization’s commodity or services from the rivalry in business. It includes finding out and relaying of the peculiar characteristics of a business’s donations while bringing out the differences between those donations and others on demand. However, it goes together with improving a strong significance recommendation to make a commodity or service desirable to marked consumers.
B. partnership
C. sole proprietorship
D. small business
Explanation:
Given that
Damage to the building = $85,000
The insurance limits is
100/25/75 means
$100,000 is the coverage amount for death also
25,000 is the bodily injury per accident
And, the 75,000 is the damage of the property
So the damage allocated between the driver and the insurance company is $10,000 which is a difference amount of
= $85,000 - $10,000
= $75,000
Because maximum amount is $75,000
B. The members of the FRS created a central bank to fund and manage government spending, which further hurt the economy
C. The FRS did not work well because the 12 regional banks each acted independently
D. The FRS revised its monetary policy so that only the President could set the national discount rate, providing relief to banks
I am not sure between B and C
This is an example of "deductive reasoning".
Deductive reasoning is a coherent procedure in which a conclusion depends on the concordance of numerous premises that are commonly thought to be valid.
Deductive reasoning is sometimes alluded to as top-down logic. Its partner, inductive thinking, is some of the time alluded to as base up rationale. Where deductive thinking continues from general premises to an explicit end, inductive thinking continues from explicit premises to a general end.
Answer:
The percent of his annual salary which are total annual benefits is 27.62%
Explanation:
The value of annual benefits as a percentage of gross annual salary can be calculated by taking the value of annual benefits and dividing it by the gross annual salary.
Percentage = Annual benefits / Gross annual salary
Percentage = 10079.71 / 36500
Percentage = 0.276156 or 27.6156% rounded off to 27.62%
The question applies the principles of demand, supply, and pricing in the context of two movie theaters - The Modern Multiplex and The Sticky Shoe. By understanding the relationship between price, demand, and the cost to serve each customer, we can analyze the probable outcomes of price regulations, like the imposition of a price floor, on the businesses.
The question pertains to the economic concept of demand curves and consumer behavior using two movie theaters as examples. The Modern Multiplex and the Sticky Shoe operate at different prices and attract different numbers of customers. The demand for movies at the multiplex is given by the equation qmm = 14 - pmm + pss, while the demand at Sticky Shoe is given by qss = 8 + 2pss - pmm. Here, 'q' represents the quantity of movies demanded and 'p' represents the respective price in dollars.
Given that Multiplex has higher expenses per customer at $4, their ticket prices would naturally be higher than Sticky Shoe, which has a lower cost per customer at $2. This translates to their demand equations; the negative sign in front of pmm in Multiplex's demand equation suggests that as prices increase, their demand decreases because more people start favoring Sticky Shoe. Similarly, the positive sign in front of pss in Sticky Shoe's demand equation indicates that as their prices decrease, more customers prefer it over Multiplex.
This problem demonstrates how price floors can create surpluses and shortages, leading to inefficiencies in the market. For instance, if a minimum price (price floor) is set above the equilibrium price, the quantity supplied at this higher price will exceed the quantity demanded, thus leading to a surplus. If not managed carefully, these surplus situations can indeed lead to losses and business closures, as shown in the movie theater example.
#SPJ12