Answer:
25 chairs per employee.
Explanation:
In this case labour productivity is the number of dining chairs per day over number of employees.
An average of 600 standard dining chairs were assembled per 6-day work week.
This means that, the number of dining chairs assembled per day is
The number if employees is 4.
Therefore the labour productivity of this operation is:
per employee.
Answer:
The answer is $400,000
Explanation:
Quantity theory of money states that the quantity of money is directly proportional total spending in an economy.
Change in quantity of money = new deposits (which can also be new security) ÷ reserve requirements
The new security is $20,000
reserve requirements is 5 percent
Change in quantity of money is:
$20,000 / 0.05
=$400,000
Answer:
b) 240
Explanation:
The fixed costs to the production of the tractors are $600.000, independently if the company makes 1 or none tractor, the company must spend $600.000 variable cost are attached to the number of tractors that the company will make. In this case the company will produce $15.000 and the variable cost is $200, its a reason why you must multiply those numbers. Excersise:
Total cost of produce n tractor = fixed costs+( number of tractors * variable cost)
where n = 15.000
Total cost of produce n tractor =$600.000+(15.000*$200)
Total cost of produce n tractor =$600.000+ ($3.000.000)
Total cost of produce 15.000 tractors = 3.600.000
Now that you have the total cost, you have to divide in the number of tractor to fin the average cost per quantity:
Average cost= (Total cost of 15.000 tractors/number of tractors)
Average cost= (3.600.000/15.000)= $240
Answer:
The equivalent units of conversion is 351,300
Explanation:
The computation of the conversion equivalent units is shown below:
= (Units completed and transferred out × conversion percentage) + (Ending Inventory × conversion percentage)
= 348,000 × 100% + $33,000 × 10%
= 348,000 + 3,300
= 351,300
All other information which is given in the question are not relevant. So, ignore other information.
B. The NPV is positive, so invest.
C. The NPV is greater than the NOI, so invest.
D. The GPI is greater than the NOI, so invest.
E. The NPV is greater than the OPX, so invest.
Answer:
Option B is correct.
The NPV is positive, so invest.
Explanation:
Year Cash Flow
0 -160000
1 8995
2 8995
3 8995
4 205995
$13,512.46
Answer:
beta= 1.5
Explanation:
The common stock of flavorful tea has an expected return of 19.65%
The return on the market is 14.5%
The risk-free rate is 4.2%
Therefore, the beta of the stock can be calculated as follows
Required return= Risk free rate+beta(market rate-risk free rate)
19.65%= 4.2%+beta(14.5%-4.2%)
19.65%= 4.2% + 14.5beta-4.2beta
19.65%= 4.2% + 10.3beta
19.65%-4.2%= 10.3beta
15.45%= 10.3beta
beta= 15.45/10.3
beta= 1.5
Hence the beta of this stock is 1.5
The beta of Flavorful Teas' common stock can be determined using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The beta, which measures a stock's volatility in comparison to the market, is calculated using the expected return of the stock, the return of the market, and the risk-free rate.
The beta of a stock is a measure of its volatility in comparison to the market as a whole, represented here by the return on the market. Beta is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between the expected return of a security and its risk. We can calculate beta using the formula: Beta = (Expected Return of the Stock - Risk-Free Rate of Return) / (Market Rate of Return - Risk-Free Rate of Return).
So in this case, the expected return on Flavorful Teas is 19.65 percent, the market return is 14.5 percent, and the risk-free rate is 4.2 percent. Plugging these values into the formula gives: Beta = (19.65 - 4.2) / (14.5 - 4.2). That will provide the value for the beta of Flavorful Teas' common stock.
#SPJ3
Answer:
D. total assets to common stockholders' equity
Explanation:
The financial leverage multiplier (FLM) is defined as the ratio of the firm’s total assets to the shareholders’ equity.
Analyzing the answer choices provided, the one that better fits the description above is alternative D. total assets to common stockholders' equity