Answer: Greenwashing
Explanation:
Greenwashing is the process of giving out a false impression or misleading the public about how the product of a company are more environmentally friendly. Companies have used greenwashing in commercials and press releases emphasizing their pollution minimization efforts and clean energy but in reality, the firm may not have a genuine commitment to environmental friendliness. Companies that make such claims are embroiled in greenwashing.
For example, a company might claim that their goods are made from recycled materials and this may be false. This is greenwashing.
Answer:
The annual YTM will be = 6.133735546% rounded off to 6.13%
Explanation:
The yield to maturity or YTM is the yield or return that an investor can earn on the bond if the bond is purchased today and is held till the bond matures. The formula to calculate the Yield to maturity of a bond is as follows,
YTM = [ ( C + (F - P / n)) / (F + P / 2) ]
Where,
C is the coupon payment
F is the Face value of the bond
P is the current value of the bond
n is the number of years to maturity
Coupon payment = 1000 * 0.06 * 6/12 = 30
Number of periods remaining till maturity = 11 * 2 = 22
semi annual YTM = [ (30 + (1000 - 989 / 22)) / (1000 + 989 / 2)
semi annual YTM = 0.03066867773 or 3.066867773% rounded off to 3.07%
The annual YTM will be = 3.066867773% * 2 = 6.133735546% rounded off to 6.13%
Upon assessing the costs of adding new suppliers and potential losses from a super-event, Phillip Witt of Witt Input Devices should manage three suppliers. Each supplier acts as an insurance against the super-event, with the cost to manage a new supplier being less than the potential loss from a super-event.
In this scenario, the president of Witt Input Devices, Phillip Witt, should consider the cost of adding a supplier against the potential risk of having them all shut down, causing a significant loss. The disadvantage of getting a new supplier is the marginal cost, which is $14,800. On the other hand, the potential loss that the firm could suffer in the event of a super-event is $480,000.
To solve this scenario, you need to consider each supplier as a form of insurance against the super-event. By looking at the probability of the super-event, we can obtain the expected loss per year which is 3% of $480,000 (0.03 * 480000 = $14,400).
Considering all factors, it appears that it would be economically feasible for Phillip Witt to manage three suppliers because the expected potential loss is less than the expense of adding a new supplier. Therefore, his best strategy is to maintain all three suppliers to minimize the overall risk.
#SPJ12
To minimize costs, Witt Input Devices should consider the likelihood of a total shutdown and the cost of managing additional suppliers. By calculating the expected cost for different numbers of suppliers, we can determine the optimal number that minimizes costs. This decision depends on the specific probabilities and costs involved.
To determine the number of suppliers that Witt Input Devices should use, we need to consider the likelihood of a total shutdown due to a 'super-event' and the cost of managing additional suppliers. According to the given information, there is a 3% probability in any year of a 'super-event' shutting down all suppliers for at least 2 weeks, resulting in a cost of $480,000. The 'unique-event' risk for any individual supplier is 5%. To minimize the overall costs, we should calculate the optimal number of suppliers by comparing the cost of managing additional suppliers to the potential losses from a shutdown.
The marginal cost of managing an additional supplier is $14,800 per year. Let's assume that Witt Input Devices can choose up to three nearly identical local suppliers, and we need to find the ideal number of suppliers for minimizing costs. We can start with one supplier and calculate the expected cost. If there is a 'super-event,' the cost will be $480,000. If there is no 'super-event,' the cost will be the annual cost of managing one supplier, which is $14,800.
Next, we can calculate the expected cost for two suppliers. The probability of both suppliers being shut down due to a 'super-event' is the square of the individual risk, which is (0.03)^2 = 0.0009. The cost would then be $480,000. The probability of only one supplier being shut down is calculated as the sum of the probability of exactly one supplier being shut down multiplied by the probability of the other supplier not being shut down. This comes out to be 2 * (0.03) * (0.97) = 0.0582. In this case, the cost would be 2 * $14,800 = $29,600. Finally, the probability of both suppliers being operational is (0.97)^2 = 0.9409, resulting in a cost of 2 * $14,800 = $29,600. Therefore, the expected cost with two suppliers is 0.0009 * $480,000 + 0.0582 * $29,600 + 0.9409 * $29,600.
We can extend this calculation to find the expected cost for three suppliers. The probabilities of all three suppliers being shut down, two suppliers being shut down and one supplier being operational, and one supplier being shut down and two suppliers being operational can be calculated using the same approach. The expected cost in this case will be 0.0009 * $480,000 + 0.0582 * $29,600 + 0.0582 * $29,600 + 0.9409 * $29,600.
By comparing the expected costs for each number of suppliers, we can determine the optimal number of suppliers that minimizes costs. The answer will be the number of suppliers with the lowest expected cost. The result will depend on the specific values of the probabilities and costs involved.
#SPJ2
Answer:
Market risk premium = 9.2%
Explanation:
The market risk premium is the difference between the market returns and the t bill yield. To calculate the market risk premium of this duration we will need to subtract the average annual t bill yield from the average annual return on the standard and poor's 500 index.
14.8-5.6=9.2
fluctuates more than measures of inflation that include food and energy prices.
gives a better measure of ongoing, sustained price changes.
provides a real, rather than a nominal, rate of inflation.
Answer:
gives a better measure of ongoing, sustained price changes.
Explanation:
Answer:
At $2 supply and demand are in equilibrium for 32 quantity
Explanation:
We have to solve for the linear equation first, and then calcualte the equilibrium price and quantity
Demand
Then we solve for h
Demand would be y = -4x +40
We repeat the process with supply
Supply is y = 6x + 20
Now we can solve for equilibrium price
-4x + 40 = 6x + 20
20 = 10x
x = 20/ 10 = 2 price
And quantity
6 x 2 + 20 = 32
-4x2 + 40 = 32
Answer:
Well, it depends on the product. But, I'd say, first, an idea for the product. Creating/designing and refining the product is next. Then, when finally satisfied, begin mass production
Explanation: