Answer:
The correct answer is: Positive Associations.
Explanation:
A person may give up soup after an illness because they might develop a negative association with it. This is due to a psychological phenomenon called conditioned taste aversion, where the person associates the food with the unpleasant feelings of being sick.
The most likely motivation for a person to give up soup after an extended illness may be due to negative associations. After a long period of illness, a person may associate the consumption of soup with the period of sickness and, thus, develop aversion to it. This aversion could lead to the decision to stop consuming soup. This psychological phenomenon is also known as 'conditioned taste aversion'.
For example, imagine a person consumed a particular soup while sick for an extended time. Even after recovery, each time this individual thinks about or tries to eat that soup, it might trigger memories of being unwell. These negative emotions can be so strong that the person might steer clear of that soup in the future, despite soup being originally a comfort food or a staple in their diet.Remember, this is associated with our survival instinct—an evolutionary mechanism to prevent us from consuming harmful food substances that might have caused illness in the past.
#SPJ3
Answer:
If a geneticist is studying the allele combinations at a cellular level, they are studying an organism's genotype. Therefore, the correct answer is a) Genotype.
people have 46 or 23 pairs
(B) Contributions to the field of biomedical research are generally considered to be significant only if the work is published.
(C) The potential scientific importance of not-yet-published work is sometimes taken into account in decisions regarding the hiring or promotion of biomedical researchers.
(D) People responsible for hiring or promoting biomedical researchers can reasonably be expected to make a fair assessment of the overall impact of a candidate's publications on his or her field.
(E) Biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion by fragmenting their research findings so that they are published in several journals instead of one.
Answer: E
Explanation:
The statement if correct argues most strongly against the claim that biomedical researchers can substantially increase their chances of promotion by fragmenting their research findings so that they are published in several journals instead of one in the sense that what counts is not the numbers of publications but it's impact. Meaning that a researcher can have several publications but yet with low impact in the field.
Answer:
I think the answer is false
Answer: False
Explanation:
Hope so