Answer:
This is greater than the initial charge, which violates the principle that the charge cannot be created or destroyed, consequently this distribution is impossible to achieve
Explanation:
The metals distribute the charge on all surface when they touch the surface increases so that charge density decreases and when the charge is separated into smaller in each metal.
Let's apply this principle to our case.
One of the spheres is loaded with a charge q, when touching a ball its charge is reduced to 1 / 2q for each ball.
qA = ½ q
qB = ½ q
qC = 0
The total charge is q
we make a second contact
If we touch the ball A again with the other sphere not charged C, the chare is distributed and when separated it is reduced by half
qA = 1/2 (q / 2) = ¼ q
qC = ¼ q
qB = ½ q
At this point all spheres have a charge,
qA = ¼ q
qb = ½ q
qC = ¼ q
The total charge is q
Now let's contact spheres B and one of the other two
Q = ½ q + ¼ q = ¾ q
When splitting the charge
qB = ½ ¾ q = 3/8 q
qC = ½ ¾ q = 3/8 q
qA = ¼ q
The total charge is q
Note that the total load is always equal to q
Now let's analyze the given configuration
Let's look for the total load
Q = qA + QB + QC
Q = ½ q + 3/8 q + ¼ q
Q = 9/8 q
This is greater than the initial charge, which violates the principle that the charge cannot be created or destroyed, consequently this distribution is impossible to achieve
The principle of charge distribution among conductive materials is violated in qA = 1/2q, qB=3/8q, qC=1/4q, as the sum of charges on B and C doesn't equate to the charge on A and 3/8q isn’t a multiple of halving the original charge.
The answer lies in the fact that balls made of conducting materials when in contact, distribute charges evenly among them. This is due to the free movement of electrons within the conductive material that seeks to equalize potential difference, a property exploited in charge distribution problems of this sort.
Given the scenario, every time a charged ball, A, touches an uncharged ball (B or C) the net charge is evenly split between them. Hence, each subsequent distribution halves the charge of the originating ball (A) and gives the complementary half to the ball it's being touched to (B or C).
In the distribution, qA = 1/2q, qB=3/8q, qC=1/4q, the sum of charges on B and C does not equate to A, which is a violation of the charge conservation principle. Moreover, 3/8q isn’t a multiple of halving the original charge q, which negates the manner in which the charge is distributed (i.e., by halving).
Learn more about Charge Distribution here:
#SPJ3
Answer:
is called online etiquette, or netiquette for short.
...
Here are some tips to help you get started:
Create Complex Passwords.
Boost Your Network Security.
Use a Firewall.
Click Smart.
Be a Selective Sharer.
Protect Your Mobile Life.
Practice Safe Surfing & Shopping.
Keep up to date.
2) If she wants to be swept a smaller distance downstream, she heads a bit upstream. Suppose she orients her body in the water at an angle of 37° upstream (where 0° means heading straight accross, how far downstream is she swept before reaching the opposite bank?
3) For the conditions, how long does it take for her to reach the opposite bank?
Answer:
1)
2)
3)
Explanation:
Given:
width of river,
speed of stream with respect to the ground,
speed of the swimmer with respect to water,
Now the resultant of the two velocities perpendicular to each other:
Now the angle of the resultant velocity form the vertical:
so,
Now the distance swept downward:
2)
On swimming 37° upstream:
The velocity component of stream cancelled by the swimmer:
Now the net effective speed of stream sweeping the swimmer:
The component of swimmer's velocity heading directly towards the opposite bank:
Now the angle of the resultant velocity of the swimmer from the normal to the stream:
Now the distance swept downstream:
3)
Time taken in crossing the rive in case 1:
Time taken in crossing the rive in case 2:
Answer:
(a) θ1 = 942.5rad, (b) θ2 = 13195 rad
Explanation:
(a) Given
ωo = 0 rad/s
ω = 3600rev/min = 3600×2(pi)/60 rad/s
ω = 377rad/s
t1 = 5s
θ1 = (ω + ωo)t/2
θ1 = (377 +0)×5/2
θ1 = 942.5 rads
(b) ωo = 377rad/s
ω = 0 rad/s
t2 = 70s
θ2 = (ω + ωo)t/2
θ2 = (377 +0)×70/2
θ2 = 13195 rad
Answer:
The speed of the white puck immediately after the collision is 2.6 m/s.
Explanation:
Given that,
Two pucks are equal masses.
Speed of black puck = 1.5 m/s
According to given figure,
We need to calculate the speed of the white puck immediately after the collision
Using law of conservation of momentum
Put the value into the formula according to figure
Hence, The speed of the white puck immediately after the collision is 2.6 m/s.
This Physics problem involves balancing the forces and torques acting on a 3.6-m-long pole. By applying the principles of equilibrium and calculations of torque, we find that 114 N of force is needed to keep the pole in a horizontal position.
This is a physics problem related to the concepts of equilibrium and torque. From the details provided, we know that the pole has a mass of 21 kg and it's 3.6 meters long. The center of gravity (cg) of the pole, since it's uniform, is at the middle, which is at 1.8 m from either end of the pole. We are then told that you are holding the pole 35 centimeters (or 0.35 meters) from its tip.
To keep the pole horizontal in equilibrium, the downward force due to the weight of the pole at its center of mass (which is equal to the mass of the pole times gravity, or 21*9.8 = 205.8 N) needs to be balanced by the sum of the torques produced by the forces you are applying at the end you are holding and the force exerted by the fence post at the other end.
Let the force you apply be F1 and the force the fence post exerts be F2. We have F2 at 0.35 m from one end (the pivot point), and F1 at 3.6 - 0.35 = 3.25 m from the pivot. Given that the torque (t) equals to Force (F) times the distance from the pivot (d), and that the net torque should equal zero in equilibrium, we have:
0.35*F2 = 3.25*F1 (1)
Because the net force should also be zero in equilibrium, we have:
F1 + F2 = 205.8 (2)
Solving these two equations, we'll be able to calculate that the force you must exert to keep the pole motionless in a horizontal position, F1, is approximately 114 N.
#SPJ12
To balance the 3.6m-long, 21 kg pole and keep it horizontally motionless, a force of approximately 114N is required
The subject question is a classic example of Torque problem specific to Physics, which involves the concepts of force, weight, and distance. To keep the pole motionless and horizontally balanced, the force you exert must counterbalance the torque due to the pole's weight. Assuming the pole is uniform, its center of gravity (cg) is at its midpoint, 1.8m from each end. The weight of the pole acts downward at this midpoint, providing a clockwise torque about the point of support, which is the fence post.
This torque is calculated as Torque = r * F = 1.8m (distance from fence post to cg) * Weight of pole = 1.8m * 21kg * 9.8m/s² (gravitational acceleration) = ~370 N.m. As the pole is motionless, the total torque about any point must be zero. Hence, the counter-clockwise torque provided by the force you exert is equal to the clockwise torque due to the weight of the pole. Using the distance from the point of your hold to the fence post (3.25m) we can calculate the force you need to exert: Force = Torque/distance = 370 N.m/3.25m = ~114N.
#SPJ11
Answer:
First statement:
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
Second statement:
Energy can be converted from one form to another.
Explanation:
According to the law of conservation of energy:energy can neither be created nor destroyed but can be converted from one form to another