what does 7 1/5 - 6 2/5 equal exactly? i've done enough math today that my brain isn't happy and i can't think straight.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: (36)/(5) - (32)/(5) = (4)/(5)

Turn them both into improper fractions, and solve from there. 

Related Questions

HELP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Graph each function. Identify the domain and range of g(x)=|-3|
Which is bigger 40% of 120 or 1/4 of 200
An photo studio is going to display a portrait in their lobby. The portrait is being reproduced from a photo with dimensions 6 inches by 3 inches. If the dimensions of the portrait in the lobby are 20 times the dimensions of the original photo, determine the area of the portrait in square feet.a. 7,200 ft2b. 50 ftc. 300 ftd. 200 ft
What is the result of dividing 48a3 + 32a2 + 16a by 4a? A. 12a2 + 8a + 4 B. 12a2 + 4a + 8 C. 12a + 8 D. 12a2 + 4a + 4

120% of it is 24. What is the number

Answers

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

1.2x = 24

x = 20

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

1.2x = 24

x = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

Functions 1 and 2 are shown below:Function 1: f(x) = −3x2 + 2
A graph of a parabola with x intercepts of negative 0.5, 0 and 2, 0 and a vertex of 0.5, 4 is shown.

Which function has a larger maximum? Type your answer as 1 or 2.

Answers

Answer:

The function 2 has a larger maximum.

Step-by-step explanation:

The vertex form of the parabola is

f(x)=a(x-h)^2+k              .... (1)

Where, (h,k) is the vertex.

The given functions are

f(x)=-3x^2+2                 ..... (2)

Since the leading coefficient is negative, therefore it is a downward parabola. It means the vertex of the parabola is the maximum point.

On comparing (1) and (2), we get

h=0,k=2

Therefore the maximum value of the function is 2 at x=0.

The second function has x intercepts of (-0.5, 0) and (2, 0) and a vertex of (0.5, 4).

It is also a downward parabola because the parabola has two x-intercepts and the vertex lies above the x-axis.

Since the vertex is (0.5, 4), therefore the maximum value of the function is 4 at x=0.5.

Maximum(F_1)=2

Maximum(F_2)=4

Therefore function 2 has a larger maximum.

Answer:

the anwser is 2 guys. i got it correct

A wholesale food sales rep is paid a base salary of $1200 per month plus a 38% commission on sales. How many sales must she generate in order to earn $35,000 per year in total compensation?

Answers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

salary per year=1200×12=14400

let the sale be $ x

14400+38 % of x=35,000

38 % of x=35,000-14,400=20,600

x=20,600 \times \frac{100}{38}=$ 54210.53

Final answer:

To earn $35,000 per year, the sales rep must generate approximately 54,210 sales.

Explanation:

To find out how many sales the wholesale food sales rep must generate in order to earn $35,000 per year in total compensation, we need to set up an equation based on the given information. Let's assume the sales generated by the rep are 'x'. The total compensation can be calculated as:



Total Compensation = Base Salary + Commission

$35,000 = $1200/month + 0.38x



Now, we can solve this equation to find 'x', the number of sales needed. First, let's convert the monthly base salary to yearly:



$1200/month * 12 months = $14,400/year



Substituting this value into the equation:



$35,000 = $14,400 + 0.38x



Now, we can isolate 'x' by subtracting $14,400 from both sides of the equation:



$20,600 = 0.38x



Finally, divide both sides of the equation by 0.38:



x = $20,600 / 0.38 = 54,210



Therefore, the wholesale food sales rep must generate approximately 54,210 sales in order to earn $35,000 per year in total compensation.

Learn more about Salary calculations

brainly.com/question/31037115?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ2

Solve 1/2n + 3 < 5 ??

Answers

Answer:

n<4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

n < 4

Step-by-step explanation:

(1)/(2) n + 3 < 5 \n subtract \: 3 \: from \: both \: sides \n  \n  (1)/(2) n < 2 \n divide \: both \: sides \: by \:  (1)/(2)  \n  \n n < 4

Sense or Nonsense?Penny wants to make a model of a beetle that is larger than life-size. Penny says she is going to use a scaling factor of 7/12. Does this make sense or is it nonsense? Explain.

Answers

Nonsense... The beetle in life size is 12/12 = 1
Therefore, to make a model bigger than this, it would have to be more than 12/12 (1). However, Penny is making it less than 1 whole meaning it would be smaller than life size.
Hope you understand this and it helps (-sorry, it's quite hard to explain!) :-)
If that's how it's displayed, 7/12, then no it doesn't make sense. Using that scale factor is the equivalent shrinking it by 5/12s. And that's not larger than life size. If the scale factor is 7:12, then it would make sense, as the beetle would be 5/19 bigger than the original. It's not much, but it's a start for Penny

Which of the following inequalities are correct?Some of the numbers involved are shown on the number line below.

Answers

Answer:

Theyre all correct

Step-by-step explanation: