Answer:
$0
Explanation:
The deductions made as seen were in the year 2019.
If Derek elects to take standard deduction in filling federal income tax return, the amount of refund will not be taxable and not to be included in 2020 gross income
Hence, no tax benefit rule applies as the standard deduction was taken in 2019.
Amount of refund that will be included in 2020 gross income is thus $0
b. Compute the multifactor productivity figures for labor and capital together. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)
c. Calculate raw material productivity figures (units/$ where $1
Answer:
Part A:
Labur Productivity:
For US=5.14, LDC=1.35
Capital Productivity:
For US=1.72 LDC=4.31
Part B:(Multi factor productivity)
For US=1.29 LDC=1.03
Part C: (Raw material productivity)
For US=4.90 LDC=10.02
Explanation:
Part A:
Labur Productivity:
For US:
For LDC:
Capital Productivity:
For US:
For LDC:
Part B:
For US:
For LDC:
Part C:
For US:
ForLDC:
Converting Raw material FC into $ (1$=10FC)
Raw Material =19550/10=$1955
Answer:
B. 37.8%, 10.8%, 162.5%
Explanation:
1. Changes in Net Sales
We know,
Percentage changes in Net sales from previous year to current year =
Given,
= $62,000
= $45,000
Therefore,
Percentage changes in Net Sales =
Percentage changes in Net Sales = 37.8% (Rounded to 1 decimal Places)
Therefore, Net sales changes 37.8% from 2016 to 2017.
2. Changes in Cost of Goods sold
We know,
Percentage changes in Cost of goods sold from previous year to current year =
Given,
= $41,000
= $37,000
Putting the value in the above formula,
Percentage changes in COGS =
Percentage changes in COGS = 10.8%
Therefore, Cost of goods sold changes 10.8% from 2016 to 2017.
3. Changes in Gross Profit
We know,
Percentage changes in Gross Profit from previous year to current year =
Given,
= $21,000
= $8,000
Hence,
Percentage changes in Gross Profit =
Percentage changes in Gross Profit = 162.5%
Therefore, Gross Profit changes 162.5% from 2016 to 2017.
Answer:
5.56%
Explanation:
Computation for holding-period return
Using this formula
Holding-period return =(Stock sales- Purchased Share + Dividend)/Purchased share
Let plug in the formula
Where,
Stock sales=92
Purchased Share=90
Dividend=3
Holding-period return=(92 - 90 + 3) / 90
Holding-period return=5/90
Holding-period return=0.0556×100
Holding-period return= 5.56%
Therefore the Holding-period return will be 5.56%
Answer:
Tarrow Corporation
a) Amount of change in millions and the percent of change:
Amount Percentage Direction
of Change of Change of Change
Revenue $30,972 8.7% Increase
Operating expenses 23,634 7.8% Increase
Operating income $7,338 13.8% Increase
b) During the recent year, revenue and operating expenses increased by 8.7% and 7.8% respectively. As a result, the operating income increased by 13.8%, from the prior year.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Tarrow Corporation:
Recent Year Prior Year Change Percentage
Revenue $386,972 $356,000 $30,972 8.7% Increase
Operating expenses 326,634 303,000 23,634 7.8% Increase
Operating income $60,338 $53,000 $7,338 13.8% Increase
Calculation of average fixed cost per unit at an activity level of 5,600 units:
The average fixed cost per unit can be calculated using the following formula:
Average Fixed cost Per unit = Total Fixed Cost / Number of Units
Total Fixed Cost at the level of 5,600 units is given $86,240
Hence, Average Fixed cost Per unit = 86240/5600 = $15.40
So, the average fixed cost per unit at an activity level of 5,600 units is $15.40
Answer:
Method B should be used
Explanation:
Note: See the attached excel file for the calculation of the present worth of Method A and Method B.
From the attached excel file, we have:
Present worth of Method A = –$210,889.85
Present worth of Method B = –$118,011.18
Since the present worth of Method A and B above imply Method A costs more than Method B, Method B should be used.