Answer:
b. eating increases the amount of oxygen available during exercise
Explanation:
The medical billing specialist wants to test whether the proportion of patients with high-deductible health plans who have overdue medical bills is greater than 51%.
a. Null Hypothesis (H₀): H₀: p ≤ 0.51
b. Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): H₁: p > 0.51
c. Significance Level (alpha, α): α = 0.05.
d. Calculate the Test Statistic:
e. Determine the Critical Value: approximately 1.645
f. If (z > 1.645), you will reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, you will fail to reject it.
g. Conclusion: If the test statistic is greater than 1.645, you can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 51% of patients with high-deductible health plans have overdue medical bills. If the test statistic is less than 1.645, you would not have enough evidence to support this claim.
The medical billing specialist wants to test whether the proportion of patients with high-deductible health plans who have overdue medical bills is greater than 51%. Let's go through the steps of hypothesis testing:
Null Hypothesis (H₀): The null hypothesis states that there is no significant difference, and the proportion of patients with high-deductible health plans who have overdue medical bills is equal to or less than 51%.
H₀: p ≤ 0.51
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): The alternative hypothesis is the claim the specialist wants to test, which is that the proportion of patients with overdue medical bills is greater than 51%.
H₁: p > 0.51
Significance Level (alpha, α): The significance level represents the level of risk you are willing to take for making a Type I error (rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true). Common values are 0.05 or 0.01. Let's choose α = 0.05.
Calculate the Test Statistic: You can use the sample proportion and standard error to calculate the test statistic, which follows a z-distribution:
Where:
- is the sample proportion (0.60).
- (p) is the proportion under the null hypothesis (0.51).
- (n) is the sample size (35).
Calculating (z):
Determine the Critical Value: At α = 0.05, using a one-tailed test (since we're testing whether it's greater than 51%), the critical value is approximately 1.645 (you can find this from a standard normal distribution table).
Decision: Compare the calculated test statistic (step d) with the critical value (step e). If (z > 1.645), you will reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, you will fail to reject it.
Conclusion: If the test statistic is greater than 1.645, you can conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 51% of patients with high-deductible health plans have overdue medical bills. If the test statistic is less than 1.645, you would not have enough evidence to support this claim.
For similar questions on medical
#SPJ1
Correct answer choice is:
All of the above could be a master status for someone .
Explanation:
Master status is a title in autecology applied to explain the status of highest interest in a specific person's life. The master status is frequently the most distinctive structure of personal integrity. General attributes are those of race or ethnicity, sex, sexual bearings, physical strength, age, financial status, faith or spirituality, and enlightenment.
Answer:
Complement proteins and antibodies coat a microorganism and provide binding sites, enabling macrophages and neutrophils to phagocytize the organism.
Explanation:
Answer:
Factitious disorders are a manifestation of physical symptoms mostly due to anxiety .
Explanation:
Factitious disorders are conditions where a person consciously produces or exaggerates symptoms for the purpose of assuming a sick role and receiving medical attention or sympathy. They are different from malingering and conversion disorder. Munchausen Syndrome is a well-known example.
Factitious disorders are a set of mental conditions characterized by a person deliberately and consistently producing, feigning, or exaggerating physical or psychological symptoms. Unlike malingering, the motivation behind factitious disorders isn't to seek external rewards but rather to assume the sick role and get medical attention. Unlike conversion disorders, the symptoms in factitious disorders are consciously controlled, not arising from a subconscious conflict.
A well-known example of a factitious disorder is Munchausen Syndrome, where a person acts as if they have a physical or mental illness when they are not really sick. They might include going as far as to creating symptoms, such as contaminating urine samples or injecting harmful substances to induce illness. Conversely, Munchausen by proxy involves the person causing injury or illness in another person, typically a child, to gain sympathy or attention.
Factitious disorders require appropriate treatment and empathetic care, but they pose diagnostic challenges because patients tend to hide the voluntary nature of their symptoms and might refuse to acknowledge even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
#SPJ3