Answer: True
Explanation:
Telecommuting is an arrangement which allow a staff or an employee not work in the organization or company’s environment but from his or her house or another location.
Flextime give employees the opportunity to decide the time they will work that is the time they will start work and the time they will close and the place or location they will work.
The correct answer is true.
Low start-up costs make it easy for companies to have a natural monopoly.
Natural monopolies are held by companies that cannot pay for start-up costs.
The government offers companies money for start-up costs to prevent natural monopolies.
The correct answer is A. High start-up costs prevent others from offering the same service in a natural monopoly.
Explanation:
In the economy, natural monopolies occur when only one company or provider offers a service or product due to natural barriers to compete. One of the most important factors that lead to monopolies is high start-up costs, because if companies or individuals are unable to cover costs of infrastructure and technology then they cannot offer certain services.
An example of this is railways because for a company to offer this service it requires a lot of infrastructures, technology, workers, etc. and therefore the start-up costs or initial cost stop many companies from offering this service letting only one company to do this and therefore creating a monopoly. Thus, start-up costs are related to natural monopolies because "High start-up costs prevent others from offering the same service in a natural monopoly".
market
value
This answer to this question is Market.
The coerrect answer is B. The interest will decrease, this is because to attain actual interest you subtract the inflation rate from the nominal interest, therefore because the inflation rate increased, the actual interest decreased.
Answer:
Besause He thinks there is a difference between murdering someone is cold blood and letting someone else die by your inaction.
Philosopher Jan Narveson argues that we are not guilty of causing someone to die when we let them starve. He believes that our moral obligations are primarily negative, meaning that we have a duty not to harm others but not necessarily a duty to help them.
Philosopher Jan Narveson does not believe that we are guilty of causing someone to die when we let them starve to death. Narveson argues that we are not responsible for the harm caused by our inaction, as long as we do not interfere with others' ability to fulfill their basic needs. According to Narveson, moral obligations are primarily negative, meaning that we have a duty not to harm others but not necessarily a duty to help them.
#SPJ11