Answer:
The answer are: total real income increased, the unemployment rate declined; Corporate profits increased.
Explanation:
As real GDP increases, people/entities in the economy enjoy actual increase in their income ( income adjusted for inflation effect), thus they will tend to spend more, making "car sales declined" a wrong answer whil "total real income increased" the right one.
Higher spending also means demand for goods and services are higher helping to boost the corporate's profit up. Once the profit is higher, corporate will have plan to expand their business leading to a higher demand in labor which in turn reduce the unemployment rate.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
B. Chatter groups
C. Similar opportunities
D. Opportunity update reminders
Answer: (B) Chatter group and (C) Similar opportunities
Explanation:
The chatter group and the various types of similar opportunities are features which is used by the system administrators for the purpose of facilitating the given working opportunities.
The chatter group is one of the type of collaboration tool in which the various types users can easily interact and also communicating socially.
According to the given question, the universal containers effectively understand that the peers are managing various types of opportunities by using the comparable products and the services with the competitors in the market.
Therefore, Option (B) and (C) are correct answer.
b. This type of risk is inherent in a firmâs operations. A standard measure of the risk per unit of return. This can be used to reduce the stand-alone risk of an investment by combining it with other investments in a portfolio.
c. A standard measure of the risk per unit of return
d. This type of risk relates to fluctuations in exchange rates
Answer:
Foreign exchange risk
Explanation:
These are the risks that an international financial transaction could accrue because of fluctuations in the currency.
A standard measure of the risk per unit of return and this type of risk relates to fluctuations in exchange rates.
Therefore, according to the following descriptions, the type of risk or term being described is Foreign exchange risk.
Answer:
c. 7215
Explanation:
Number of shares of Stock C = 275
Value of Stock C = $52
Number of shares of Stock D = 240
Value of Stock D = $23
The weight of stock of a given stock is defined by the total value of the stock divided by the total value of the portfolio. For stock C:
The weight of of Stock C is 0.7215 or 72.15%.
Answer:
C. $ 140 comma 625 unfavorable
Explanation:
The formula to compute the direct labor efficiency variance is shown below:
= Standard labor rate × (Standard hours for actual output - Actual hours)
where,
Standard labor rate is $11.25
Standard hours for actual output is 27,500
And, actual hour is 40,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $11.25 × (27,500 hours - 40,000 hours)
= $140,625 unfavorable
Since actual hours is more than the standard hours so there is a unfavorable variance
Answer:
An contract is an understanding agreement that can be implemented in court it is a shaped by two or more gatherings who consent to perform or to cease from playing out some demonstration now or later on . The target hypothesis of agreements not by the individual or subjective aim or conviction of a gathering .The hypothesis is that gathering's expectation to go into an agreement is judged by outward destinations truths as deciphered by a sensible individual ,as opposed to by the gathering's mystery subjective aims . the essential components of a substantial contract and the path in which an agreement is made. The agreements that fall under this circumstance would be the agreement of arrangement contract of development ,contract of execution and the agreement of enforceability. The main contract would be the agreement of arrangement .They are contracts that are grouped in light of how when an agreement of development .
In the event that Ed had constantly paid for all the earlier pieces of candy, there gives off an impression of being suggested in actuality contract taking into account the earlier course of dealings amongst Ed and Fran.
Waving the sweet treat at Fran can be seen as an affirmation that Ed was not surreptitiously taking the piece of candy, but rather was demonstrating that he would get her the cash for that one later. His questionable signal in light of the gatherings earlier course of managing could sensibly be translated by Fran as a nonverbal IOU at the cost of that 1 piece of candy.There can likewise be an inferred in law contract taking into account the same certainties since to not force a suggested in law guarantee to pay results in the uncalled for improvement of Ed at the expense of Fran.Either sort of inferred contract is enforceable in Court.
The situation between Ed and Fran and the brownie forms an implied-in-fact contract, based on their established habitual behaviors. It's an executed and enforceable contract assuming there are no factors that may render the contract unenforceable.
In the scenario presented, a contract indeed exists between Ed and Fran. This is an implied-in-fact contract because it was formed by the conduct of the parties involved rather than a formal agreement. Ed's habitual behavior of picking up items and paying for them establishes a pattern of conduct and an unspoken agreement.
In terms of performance, this is an executed contract, because Ed picked up a brownie and walked out. Presumably, from past behavior, he is expected to pay later.
As for enforceability, assuming there are no elements that may render the contract unenforceable (such as fraud or mistake), it is enforceable. Fran could presumably sue for breach of contract if Ed failed to pay for the brownie.
#SPJ11
Answer:
Cash 66,880 debit
Due from factor 7,600 debit
Loss on factoring 6,120 debit
Accounts Receivables 76,000 credit
Recourse Liability 4,600 credit
Explanation:
Accounts receivable factored: 76,000
Cash received 90% of 76,000 = 68,400
less bank charge fee: 76,000 x 2% = 1,520
total: 66,880
Due from factoring = 76,000 x 10% 7,600
Recourse liability: 4600
The loss is calcualte bu difference:
The bank receives 76,000 dollars of Accounts receivables
It pays 66,880 It makes us assuma liability for 4,600
and potentially can paid up to 7,600
Net: 69,880
difference: 76,000 - 66,880 = 6,120