The fourth alternative is correct.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen is the fruit of the French Revolution in 1979. It was a movement aimed at deconstructing the French hierarchical system, which came from the absolutist monarchy, which divided French citizens into three classes, clergy, aristocracy and the common people, which was limited by the oppressions of the state.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen represents a change of perspective by raising awareness that the people should be central to the development of any state, not vice versa.
This was a document of historical importance that influenced the awakening of various peoples to their rights and served as inspiration for the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The correct answer is “the declaration abolished the three estates”. The three estates consisted in the clergy, the aristocracy, and the common people. The first two had special rights, so the declaration gave citizens rights they didn’t have before which was liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
With their animals and technology, the Spanish sought to project an air of dominance. Perhaps the Spanish wanted to appear as though they would prevail, luring in more native friends in the process.
The imperial Spanish sensibility implied that the motecuzoma responded in terror when given the news that was less than comforting since they concentrated on the Spanish's terrifying weaponry and animals. It appears exceedingly improbable that Motecuzoma or the Aztecs would have exhibited dread in such a degrading manner given the tangible response of the Aztecs to the Spanish invasion.
By displaying this depiction of Motecuzoma, the Spanish and their native allies want to portray the Aztec Emperor as a coward. Hernán Cortés, a Spanish conqueror, wanted his allies to believe that Motecuzoma Emperor was wary of the Spanish people. To give the allies and Spanish forces more confidence to prevail on the battlefield, the Spanish conqueror attempted to depict him as a weak monarch.
Learn more about Motecuzoma, here:
#SPJ2
Answer: The Spanish were trying to make the Aztec leader out to be a coward and weak.
The Spanish were attempting to give the impression of being powerful with their animals and technology.
Perhaps the Spanish were trying to give the impression that they were likely to win—thereby attracting more indigenous allies.
Explanation:
the following document based on indigenous account but filtered through imperial Spanish sensibilities suggested that the motecuzoma reacted with fright when presented with reports that were less than reassuring since they focused on fearsome weapons and animals of the Spanish. Given the material response of Aztecs to the Spanish invasion it seems highly unlikely that Motecuzoma or the azetecs would have expressed terror in such a humiliating fashion
The Sepoy Rebellion and the Boxer Rebellion were both anti-colonial uprisings triggered by resentment against foreign interference and associated cultural and religious impositions by the European colonizers in India and China respectively.
One commonality between the Sepoy Rebellion in India and the Boxer Rebellion in China was that both were anti-colonial uprisings sparked by local discontent with foreign interference and associated changes. These uprisings were largely reactions to cultural and religious intrusions induced by European colonizers.
The Sepoy Rebellion started in 1857 when Indian soldiers, known as sepoys, revolted against the British East India Company. The final trigger for the rebellion was the introduction of the new Enfield rifle, which required soldiers to bite off a part of the bullet cartridge reportedly greased with beef and pork fat – a sacrilege to both Hindus and Muslims.
Similarly, the Boxer Rebellion which commenced in 1899 in China, was led by a secret group named the Society of the Righteous and Harmonious Fists, widely known as the ‘Boxers’. It was a violent anti-foreign and anti-colonial uprising aimed at eliminating foreign influence.
#SPJ2
Answer:
After the Treaty of Versailles (1919), the losing Germany of World War I was sentenced to pay war reparations to the allies worth 226,000 million gold marks, an impossible figure, set in order to punish the bellicose nation and to curb a rapid recovery that could be followed by new hostilities. Between 1924 and 1929, the Weimar Republic remained almost exclusively from loans received from the United States (more than one billion dollars), partly destined to defray the aforementioned compensation. But the situation for Germany was untenable, and the crack of 29, in addition to huge losses for the lenders, opened the possibility of debt renegotiation: so, in 1930 (Young Plan), that huge payment obligation was formally left reduced ... in half (112,000 million). Between 1931 and 1932, and given the situation of the world economy, USA. decides to forgive war debts to France and the United Kingdom, who, in turn, renounce as creditors a good part of the German debt. Summing up, in 1932, Germany achieved a net reduction of more than 98% of the debts that forced it to have launched World War I
b. False