Answer:
9.50 times
Explanation:
The computation of the accounts payable turnover ratio is shown below:
= Total purchase ÷ average accounts payable
where,
Average accounts payable = (Opening balance of Accounts payable + ending balance of Accounts payable) ÷ 2
= ($48,000 + $40,000) ÷ 2
= $44,000
And, the total purchase is $418,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the answer would be equal to
= $418,000 ÷ $44,000
= 9.50 times
Answer:
β2 should have a positive sign
Explanation:
The regression equation is:
βwght = β0+β1cigs+β2faminc+μ
The equation tells us that the birth weight of a child is dependent on factors like cigarette consumption and family income.
β1 should have a negative sign because smoking during pregnancy has an adverse effect on birth weight. So there would be a negative correlation between birth weight and cigarette consumption.
β2 should have a positive sign. This is because while pregnant, a family with more income has the ability to provide better prenatal care and also better nutrition to the expectant mother. Therefore we have a positive correlation.
In a regression model concerning effects of smoking and income on infant birth weight, the coefficient 'b2' associated with family income is expected to be positive. Higher income levels are associated with improved prenatal care and nutrition, which contribute positively to infant birth weight.
The equation you presented is a form of a multiple regression model where 'bwght' is the dependent variable (infant birth weight), and 'cigs' and 'faminc' are independent variables representing the number of cigarettes smoked and family income, respectively. The terms 'b0', 'b1', and 'b2' are the model's parameters. In the context of this model, 'b2' represents the change in the infant's birth weight for a one-unit change in family income, holding all else constant.
The most likely sign for 'b2' is positive. This is because higher family income is generally associated with better access to prenatal care and nutrition which in turn positively impact the infant's birth weight.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Please see explanation below
Explanation:
Before Investment for the real estate development in a foreign country, it is very crucial to determine the viability of the project, and more importantly how the cash flows are being populated over the period. One of the major risks involved in investing in foreign country is the currency exchange risk. The value of currencies for the countries continue to fluctuate based on several economic conditions and other macro factors.
If a regulator in a foreign country is devaluing the country’s currency, then it goes in favour of exporters, as the foreign consumers can afford to buy more goods and services with the same amount. However, the people residing in the the country(importers) faces a huge trouble spending in foreign country due to currency devaluation.
To identify the creditworthiness of the project we need information regarding the property prices, its growth, and public spending in the country where we want to make our investment. Secondly, we need the historical data of currency devaluation event (if any) to assess the actual impact it will have on the economy once the devaluation takes place. Thirdly, we need to identify the exposures or the risk involved in operating the business in the foreign country, and how are we go about mitigating the risk from transaction and operating exposure.
Contributions in excess of 10% limitation 1,500
Interest paid for tax-exempt bonds 1,000
Tax-exempt interest received 3,000
Federal income taxes 55,400
MACRS depreciation in excess of straight-line alternative depreciation system 1,500
a. $226,600
b. 220,600
c. $282,000
d. $228,600
Answer:
a. $226,600
Explanation:
Profit = $ (95000+185000-1500
- 1,000 + 3,000 - 55,400 + 1,500 )= $226000
items added back to profit are allowed deductions while items deducted are disallowed deductions
Depreciation was added back to profit because method used was in excess of straight line method and so does not reflect true depreciation
monetize and count
express corporate responsibility
Using the perspective of a business owner of a mid-size manufacturer, select the approach/approaches you would recommend for this company (mid-size manufacturer). Support the selection by explaining the approach, describing which of the five (5) environmental positions you espouse, and how the approach and positions relate to key ethical theories we have studied?
1. The environment shouldn’t be protected.
2. The environment should be protected in the name of serving human welfare.
3. The environment should be protected in the name of serving future generations’ welfare.
4. The environment should be protected in the name of serving animal welfare.
5. The environment should be protected for its own sake.
Answer:
To answer the above question , the closest and which includes all human, animal and realted welfare is
"The environment should be protected in the name of serving future generations’ welfare".
Explanation : when it comes to buisness, ethics and moral with code of conduct the ultimate reason behind this is to make the better world to serve future generation with all such discipline and carry forward the same positive approach towards all human, animal and other welfare's.
By this above option/approach is different and consider a cumulative welfare for better world to serve future generation.
Coming to other option/approach is only specific to certain groups only and it does'nt through light on other's welfare.
To add more , "when you focus on one group of welfare success will be there but if you focus and prioritize together with better competency and required area success path is wide and opened"
So saving and serving the environment to future generation is high valued and required. By this we can able to match the ethical, moral and social responsibality.
b. U.S. fertilizer firm.
c. Canadian bank.
d. Apple market
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
Ending Inventory:21,267.70
Explanation:
cost retail
beginning 12,700 20,900
purchases 113,930 158,500
markups 9,600
markdowns (7,400)
total 126,630 181,600
inventory to retail ratio: 126,630 / 181,600 = 0.6973
sales revenues 151,100
COGS: 151,100 x 0.6973 = 105,362.30
Ending Inventory: 126,630 - 105,362.30 = 21,267.70