Answer:
3.108 mi
Explanation:
at present the workforce complement = 471 which has to grow by 10%
So, the complements after growth = 471 x 1.1 = 518 (rounded off)
Total recruiting cost = No. of complements x ($1000 + Recruiting spend)
= 518 x ($1000 + $5000)
= $3,108,000 i.e. 3.108 mi
The recruitment cost for Baldwin's workforce next year, given the same additional spend per person as the previous year and a 10% increase in the workforce, is expected to be $2.842866 Million. This isn't among the answer options given, which may suggest an error in the question or in the options.
In this question, the Baldwin's workforce complement is expected to grow by 10% next year. The workforce complement this year is 471, meaning it would become 471×1.1=518 next year (rounded to the nearest person). We were given that the recruiting cost this year is 543k, and the additional amount spent above the $1,000 recruiting base last year is $5,000k - $543k = $4,457k.
Assuming the Baldwin spends the same additional amount as they did last year, their total recruiting cost next year can be estimated. Given: Base Recruiting cost = $1,000 , Additional Recruiting cost = $4,457/person. Hence , if they hire 518 people, The total cost of the recruiting would be (Base cost + Additional per person cost)× number of people hired = (1000+4457)× 518 = $2.842866 Million.
However the given options do not include this amount, so there might be an error in the question or in the specified options.
#SPJ3
Answer:
B. a location with weak environmental rules that attracts manufacturing companies due to decreased costs.
Explanation:
A pollution haven is when companies establish factories or offices abroad in countries in which they have lower costs and have access to all the resources they need. Also, these locations tend to be in developing nations in which the environmental standards tend to be lower than the ones in developed nations. According to this, the answer is that a pollution haven is a location with weak environmental rules that attracts manufacturing companies due to decreased costs.
The other options are not right because a pollution haven is attractive for multinational investment because of the lower cost and it is not related to ambient pollution. Also, a pollution haven has low wages but it is not the only thing that defines it and it is not a place where people like pollution.
Answer:
An contract is an understanding agreement that can be implemented in court it is a shaped by two or more gatherings who consent to perform or to cease from playing out some demonstration now or later on . The target hypothesis of agreements not by the individual or subjective aim or conviction of a gathering .The hypothesis is that gathering's expectation to go into an agreement is judged by outward destinations truths as deciphered by a sensible individual ,as opposed to by the gathering's mystery subjective aims . the essential components of a substantial contract and the path in which an agreement is made. The agreements that fall under this circumstance would be the agreement of arrangement contract of development ,contract of execution and the agreement of enforceability. The main contract would be the agreement of arrangement .They are contracts that are grouped in light of how when an agreement of development .
In the event that Ed had constantly paid for all the earlier pieces of candy, there gives off an impression of being suggested in actuality contract taking into account the earlier course of dealings amongst Ed and Fran.
Waving the sweet treat at Fran can be seen as an affirmation that Ed was not surreptitiously taking the piece of candy, but rather was demonstrating that he would get her the cash for that one later. His questionable signal in light of the gatherings earlier course of managing could sensibly be translated by Fran as a nonverbal IOU at the cost of that 1 piece of candy.There can likewise be an inferred in law contract taking into account the same certainties since to not force a suggested in law guarantee to pay results in the uncalled for improvement of Ed at the expense of Fran.Either sort of inferred contract is enforceable in Court.
The situation between Ed and Fran and the brownie forms an implied-in-fact contract, based on their established habitual behaviors. It's an executed and enforceable contract assuming there are no factors that may render the contract unenforceable.
In the scenario presented, a contract indeed exists between Ed and Fran. This is an implied-in-fact contract because it was formed by the conduct of the parties involved rather than a formal agreement. Ed's habitual behavior of picking up items and paying for them establishes a pattern of conduct and an unspoken agreement.
In terms of performance, this is an executed contract, because Ed picked up a brownie and walked out. Presumably, from past behavior, he is expected to pay later.
As for enforceability, assuming there are no elements that may render the contract unenforceable (such as fraud or mistake), it is enforceable. Fran could presumably sue for breach of contract if Ed failed to pay for the brownie.
#SPJ11
To record the collection of the note and interest at its maturity, Ayayai Corp. first must calculate and record the accrued interest at the year-end, and then upon maturity, record the collection of the total amount received and credit the Notes Receivable and Interest Revenue.
The first step is to calculate the accrued interest on December 31, 2022. The note was issued on August 1, so the time period until December 31 is 5 months. To calculate the accrued interest, use the formula principal x interest rate x time (in years).
For our case: $48000 x 0.06 x (5/12) = $1200. So, Ayayai Corp. must record an accrual of $1,200 in interest receivable on December 31, 2022. This is done with a debit to Interest Receivable and a credit to Interest Revenue.
When the note matures 9 months from August 1, which will be in May 2023, both the principal and the full interest are due. The interest for 9 months would be $48000 * 0.06 * (9/12) = $2160. Thus, upon collection, Ayayai would debit Cash for the total amount received (principal + full interest), debit Interest Receivable for $1200, credit Notes Receivable for the principal amount, and credit Interest Revenue for the remaining $960.
#SPJ12
Answer:
It is unethical for the CFO to record the additional $75,000 without receipts and supporting documents
Explanation:
The company balance sheet needs to reflect the true financial position of the firm, hence the right thing to do is to ask for documentation and receipts before recording the additional $ 75,000.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in a microsoft excel document.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
2. %
Answer:
Margin of safety in dollars is $91,000
Margin of safety as percentage of sales is 26%
Explanation:
Margin of safety can be defined as the amount of output or sales that a business can make before it reaches its breakeven point.
To calculate margin of safety in dollars
Margin of safety= Sales - Breakeven sales
Margin of safety= 350,000- 259,000
Margin of safety= $91,000
To calculate margin of safety as a percentage of sales, we use the following formula.
Margin of safety = (Sales- Breakeven point) ÷ Sales
Margin of safety = (350,000- 259,000)÷ 350,000
Margin of safety= 0.26= 26%
Answer:
1. Margin of Safety(MOS) expressed in dollars =91,000
2. Margin of Safety(MOS) expressed as percentage = 26% (to the nearest whole number)
Explanation:
The MARGIN OF SAFETY is applied as a measure of the difference between the actual sales and break-even sales.
In other words, to find Margin of Safety, you subtract break-even sales from the actual sales.
MOS is used to determine at which level sales can drop before a business incurs losses. It is a tool by which actual or budgeted sales may be decreased without resulting in any loss.
1. Formula for Margin of Safety(in dollars):
Margin of Safety(in dollars) = Actual/Budgeted Sales ➖ Break-even Sales
Where:
Actual Sales = $350,000
Break-even Sales = $259,000
➡ Margin of Safety(in dollars) = $350,000 ➖ $259,000 = 91,000(ans)
2. Formula for Margin of Safety (expressed as a percentage) = [(Actual/Budgeted Sales ➖ Break-even Sales) ➗ Actual/Budgeted Sales] ✖ 100%
Where:
Actual Sales = $350,000
Break-even Sales = $259,000
➡ Margin of Safety (in percentage) = [($350,000 ➖ $259,000) ➗ $350,000] ✖ 100%
= ($91,000 ➗ $350,000) ✖ 100%
= 0.26 ✖ 100% = 26%(ans).