The excerpt from the dissent on Tinker v. Des Moines represents a dissenting opinion, showing disagreement with the majority view on the armband issue.
This excerpt from the dissent on the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case serves as an example of a dissenting opinion. This is an opinion written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority opinion of the court. In Tinker v. Des Moines, the key issue was whether the First Amendment prevented school administrators from banning students' sign of protest in the form of armbands. The excerpt details the dissenting view that, despite not causing a clear disruption, the armbands indeed had the potential to incite disorder as predicted by the school officials.
#SPJ2
this The mitigation of damages doctrine, also known as the doctrine of avoidable consequences, prevents an injured party from recovering damages that could have been avoided through reasonable efforts. The duty to mitigate damages is most traditionally employed in the areas of tort and contract law. In a breach of contract case, upon receiving notice that one party to a contract does not intend to perform, the other party is required to mitigate damages,
You owe this strange intelligence, or why
Upon this blasted heath you stop our way
With such prophetic greeting? Speak, I charge you