Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here is a sample balance sheet for the Spartan Bike Shop credit card transactions:
Date | Transaction | Deposit | Withdraw | Balance
--------------------------------------------------------------
01/01/2022 | Starting balance | - | - | $4,500
01/15/2022 | Purchase of supplies| - | $500 | $4,000
02/05/2022 | Payment received | $1,000 | - | $5,000
02/20/2022 | Equipment purchase | - | $2,500 | $2,500
03/10/2022 | Refund received | $300 | - | $2,800
In this example:
- The starting balance on 01/01/2022 is $4,500.
- On 01/15/2022, the shop made a purchase of supplies, resulting in a withdrawal of $500 from the credit card account, leaving a balance of $4,000.
- On 02/05/2022, the shop received a payment of $1,000, which was deposited into the credit card account, increasing the balance to $5,000.
- On 02/20/2022, the shop made an equipment purchase, resulting in a withdrawal of $2,500 from the credit card account, leaving a balance of $2,500.
- On 03/10/2022, the shop received a refund of $300, which was deposited into the credit card account, increasing the balance to $2,800.
This balance sheet provides a clear record of the credit card transactions for the Spartan Bike Shop, including the dates, transaction details, deposits, withdrawals, and the resulting balance after each transaction. It helps the shop keep track of their credit card activity and maintain an accurate record of their financial transactions.
!/5x1/5 =2/5
!/5 one possible of the total of 5
Multiply both
Michael and Derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain.
Line AB is parallel to EF, transversal GJ crosses line AB at K and crosses line EF at L.
Michael's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. angle AKG is congruent to angle AKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
4. angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK 4. Transitive Property
Derrick's Proof
Statement Justification
1. line AB ∥ line EF with transversal segment GJ 1. Given
2. angle AKG is congruent to angle BKL 2. Vertical Angles Theorem
3. angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK 3. Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
4. angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK 4. Transitive Property
The proof that is completed incorrectly is Michael's proof of the statement "corresponding angles AKG and ELK are congruent."
Both proofs start with the same given information – lines AB and EF are parallel, and transversal segment GJ crosses line AB at point K and crosses line EF at point L. Both proofs also rely on the same theorems – the vertical angles theorem and the alternate interior angles theorem. However, the difference is in the way the two proofs make the jump from the first three statements to the fourth statement.
In Michael's proof, statement number 3 is incorrect. Statement 3 in Michael's proof states that "angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK" based on the alternate interior angles theorem. However, this statement is not true because the interior angle BKL is not formed by the intersection of two straight lines from a point on the line AB and a point on the line EF, which is required for the alternate interior angles theorem to apply.
In contrast, Derrick's proof uses the vertical angles theorem before applying the transitive property in statement 4. The statement "angle AKG is congruent to angle ELK" in Derrick's proof is a result of applying the transitive property to the statement that "angle AKG is congruent to angle BKL" in statement 3 and the statement that "angle BKL is congruent to angle ELK" in statement 2, which are both results of applying the vertical angles theorem. This is a valid proof.
Therefore, Michael's proof is incorrect because of an incorrect application of the alternate interior angles theorem, while Derrick's proof is correct because it uses the vertical angles theorem and applies the transitive property correctly.
days is 13 days.