Answer:
Debit Credit
June 10 Accounts Receivables $8400
Merchandise $8400
June 12 Merchandise $500
Accounts Receivables $500
June 19 Cash 7663
Discount 237
Accounts Receivables $7900
Explanation:
The transactions in Cullumber's books include sales revenue, accounts receivable, sales returns and allowances, and finally a cash entry alongside sales discounts when Marin pays the balance due.
The transactions on the books of Cullumber Company would be recorded as follows:
#SPJ3
Answer:
Explanation:
The arrival rate (λ) = 20 customers per hour. Since the service times at the pump have an exponential distribution with a mean of 2 minutes, therefore the service rate (μ) = 60 / 2 = 30 customers per hour.
The probability of the no customers being in the system(P₀) is given as:
If no customer is in the system we can sell gasoline for $4/gallon to the next customer. The expected price p of gasoline is given by:
P = $3.665 per gallon
Answer:
NONE
Explanation:
The treasury stock sales increase additional paid-in capital treasury stock. It do not generate net income the stokc are part of equity transactions. They cannot generate a gain, the differnece in value betwene cost and reissuance of the shares will be adjusted against additional paid-in capital Treasu Stock as state before.
Answer:
Correct answer is 12.11%
Explanation:
expected dividend =$3.2*60%
=$1.92
Hence cost of equity from new common stock=(D1/Current price(1-Floatation cost)+Growth rate
=1.92/(30(1-0.1))+0.05
=(1.92/27)+0.05
which is equal to
=12.11%(Approx).
Answer: 12.11%
Explanation:
GIVEN THE FOLLOWING ;
Earning per Share = $3.20
Expected dividend pay out ratio.(proportion of earning paid out as interest.)
Cost of stock per share = $30
Dividend growth rate = 5%= 0.05
Floatation cost = 10% = 0.1
Cost of equity=(dividend/(Current price(1-Floatation cost)) +Growth rate
Cost of Equity =[ (1. 92÷(30(1 - 0.1)) + 0.05
Cost of equity = [ (1.92 ÷ (30(0.9)) + 0.05
Cost of equity = (1.92 ÷ 27) + 0.05
Cost of equity = 0.07111111 + 0.05 = 0.121111
0.12111 × 100 = 12.11%
Answer: $0.60
Price per loaf: $2
Discount given for its bread at the end of the day= 70%
Solution:
Salvage value is the estimated resale value of a product at the end of its useful life. Since theuseful life of the loaf is 1 day and it was sold at the end of the day at 70%off, the salvage value is
$2 × (1 - 70%)
$0.60.
The salvage value of the bread from Bakery A at the end of the day, following a 70% discount, is $0.10 per loaf. This is calculated by subtracting the cost to make the bread ($0.50) from the discounted selling price ($0.60).
The salvage value of the bread from Bakery A can be calculated by subtracting the cost of production from the discounted selling price. The initial selling price of the bread is $2.00, and the cost to make a loaf is $0.50. However, at the end of the day, Bakery A gives a 70% discount on its bread. So, the discounted selling price is now 30% of the initial price, which is $2.00 * 0.30 = $0.60.
Given that the cost to make the bread is $0.50, the salvage value of the bread is the discounted selling price of $0.60 minus the cost to make the bread which is $0.50. So, the salvage value is $0.60 - $0.50 = $0.10.
#SPJ3
Answer:
$26.52
Explanation:
The computation of the maximum price for paying for the stock today is shown below:
As we know that
Required rate of return = (Sale of the stock - maximum price + dividend received) ÷ (maximum price)
0.15 = ($28 - maximum price + $2.50) ÷ (maximum price)
0.15 × maximum price = $28 - maximum price + $2.50
So, the maximum price is $26.52
We simply applied the above formula
Student Version
To summarize, the elaboration model of instruction starts by presenting knowledge at a very general or simplified level in the form of a special kind of overview. Then it proceeds to add detail or complexity in "layers" across the entire breadth of the content of the course (or curriculum), one layer at a time, until the desired level of detail or complexity is reached.
References:
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 425-453). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
They soon switched to a model based on the elaboration theory (Reigeluth, 1999). Using this approach, the game would begin with a level that offered the simplest version of the whole task (the epitome); subsequent levels would become increasingly more complex--an approach common to videogames--with opportunities for review and synthesis.
References:
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 425-453). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
a)Word-for-Word plagiarism
b)Paraphrasing plagiarism
c)This is not plagiarism
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": This is not plagiarism.
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the act of taking someone else's work and make it appear as if it belongs to another party. It also implies paraphrasing words from an article or changing the order of some of the words to give it a genuine look. Plagiarism is considered a misdemeanor but can be penalized.
The student's version in the example is not plagiarism because the source from where the student takes the reference of the elaboration theory is mentioned:
They soon switched to a model based on the elaboration theory (Reigeluth, 1999).
Thus, the student is recognizing that the conclusion was taken from another resource. The rest of the student's paragraph is related to another field of study - videogames - making a unique version only relating the theory.