Answer:
-11
Step-by-step explanation:
-3 2/3 divide 1/3
-11/3 / 1/3
-11/3 *3/1=-33/3 = -11
The peregrine falcon flies in the time it takes the eagle to fly 40 miles is 64 miles away.
The average speed is the total distance traveled by the object in a particular time interval.
The average speed is a scalar quantity.
The average speed of a golden eagle is 30 mph and the average speed of a peregrine falcon is 48 mph.
The time to fly 40 miles (that time is x):
miles hours
30 ⇒ 1
40 ⇒ x
We use the ruleof three which is to multiply the cross quantities on the table and divide by the remaining quantity:
x = 40(1)/30
x = 4/3 hour
it takes the eagle 4/3 flies to fly 40 miles.
Now we use the velocity of the falcon: 48mph, which can also be represented as:
miles hours
48 ⇒ 1
and we need the distance in miles that the falcon flies in 4/3 hours :
miles hours
48 ⇒ 1
x ⇒ 4/3
Again we use the rule of three (multiply cross quantities and divide by the remainingquantity)
x = (48)× (4/3)
x = 64 miles
Hence, the peregrine falcon flies in the time it takes the eagle to fly 40 miles is 64 miles away.
Learn more about average speed here;
#SPJ2
Answer:
64
Step-by-step explanation:
64 miles
Answer:
D) {-1}
Step-by-step explanation:
A rational expression is "not defined" when its denominator is zero. Hence to find values of x that make the expression "not defined," you solve the equation ...
denominator = 0
2x +2 = 0 . . . . . . put the actual denominator into the equation
x + 1 = 0 . . . . . divide by 2
x = -1 . . . . . . . . subtract 1
The expression is "not defined" for x in the set {-1}.
9*8=72
72-5=67
The final answer is 67.
Please mark Brainliest
Thank you
a) The histograms suggest that the distributions of adoptions in each region are skewed to the right.
b) The histograms look similar because they both show similar patterns of adoption distribution among different regions.
c) A better way to express the number of adoptions might be to use adoption rates or percentages relative to the population size in each region.
a) The histograms show the distribution of adoptions in each region. The horizontal axis represents the number of adoptions, and the vertical axis represents the frequency (or count) of regions with a specific number of adoptions. Each bar in the histogram represents a specific number of adoptions and its height indicates how many regions have that number of adoptions.
b) The histograms look similar because they both show the distribution of adoptions in different regions. They have a similar shape, with the majority of regions having a lower number of adoptions, and a few regions having a higher number of adoptions. This similarity suggests that the adoption patterns in different regions follow a similar trend.
c) A better way to express the number of adoptions might be to use percentages or rates. Since the population of each region is different, the raw number of adoptions alone might not provide a fair comparison. By calculating the adoption rate (number of adoptions per 1000 people, for example) or expressing the number of adoptions as a percentage of the total population in each region, we can get a clearer picture of the adoption trends relative to the population size in each region.
Learn more about histograms here:
#SPJ4
The histograms indicate that higher population regions tend to have more adoptions. They are similar as adoption rates and population sizes are interlinked. A better representation might be the adoption rate per population quota, which shows comparison between regions clearer.
a) The histograms show the "distribution of adoptions" and the "population of each region." We can infer that the distribution of adoptions largely mirrors the population distribution, meaning that regions with larger populations tend to have more adoptions.
b) The histograms look similar because adoption rates and population size are related. If a region has a larger population, it likely has more families, hence more potential for adoption.
c) A better way to express the number of adoptions might be to calculate the adoption rate per population. For example, the number of adoptions per 1,000 or 10,000 population members. This way, it directly relates the number of adoptions to the size of the population, and provides a percentage or ratio rather than absolute numbers. This method can be more helpful in making comparisons between regions.
#SPJ3
Answer:
1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
divide the value in feet by 5280 because 1 mile equals 5280 feet.
Answer:There are 5280 feet in one mile; thus
1320/5280 = 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
sorry if its not correct }: