Event B: rolling a number larger than 4
Overlapping events ?
or
disjointed events ?
Answer:
Overlapping events
Step-by-step explanation:
Note that in the question, it specifically specifies that there is only a number cube (or 1 number cube). Note that the two events asked for us to solve is does not conflict at all.
Event A is asking for the probability of you rolling a prime number (1 , 3 , 5), while Event B is asking for the probability of you rolling a number larger than 4 (5 , 6). These two can occur at the same time, and both events can be confirmed by rolling the number 5.
~
Answer:
overlapping events
Step-by-step explanation:
Event A: Rolling a prime
The following are the prime numbers from 1 to 6 (inclusive):
2,3,5
Event B: Rolling a number larger than 4
The following are larger than 4 from 1 to 6 (inclusive):
5,6
Do you see any overlap?
The overlap is 5.
These are overlapping events.
It is because the first quadrants have positive values of x and y.
Quadrants are one-fourth of coordinate geometry and it is counted in an anticlockwise direction from the right top.
The angle of any quadrant is 90 degrees.
The only quadrant in which x and y both are positive is the first quadrant.
If we draw any figure in the first quadrants then it becomes easy to do any operation because of the positive values of x and y.
For example, if you want to measure distance then in the first quadrant it si positive but in the second or any other either x or y or both will be negative.
Hence "It is because the first quadrants have positive values of x and y".
To learn more about quadrants,
#SPJ2
b. Use expressions for the length and width to write an inequality for the
perimeter, on the basis of the given information.
c. Solve the inequality, clearly indicating the width of the rectangle.
Part A
w = width
L = length
L = w+8 since the length is 8 mm longer than the width
====================================================
Part B
P = perimeter of rectangle
P = 2*(L+W) = 2L + 2W
We want the perimeter to be more than 32 mm, so we want P to be greater than 32
This means we write P > 32
Replace P with either 2(L+W) or 2L+2W. I'll pick 2L+2W
So we go from
P > 32
to
2L+2W > 32
After this, replace L with W+8 (refer to part A above)
We now have
2(W+8) + 2W > 32
====================================================
Part C
Let's solve the inequality found in part B to get...
2(w+8) + 2w > 32
2w + 16 + 2w > 32
4w + 16 > 32
4w + 16-16 > 32-16 ....... subtracting 16 from both sides
4w > 16
4w/4 > 16/4 ......... dividing both sides by 4
w > 4
B) 3 x 106
C) 6 x 105
D) 6 x 106
9 x 10^-4: Since the exponent of the scientific notation is negative −4, move the decimal point 4 places to the left. Answer: 0.0009
3 x 10^-10: Since the exponent of the scientific notation is negative −10, move the decimal point 10 places to the left. Answer: 0.0000000003
Subtract: C) 6 x 105