The Federal Government is legally authorized to get financing by issuing US Savings Bonds. These debt securities are issued by the government and offered to all citizens. When a citizen buys a US Savings bond, he or she "loans" an amount of money to the government with the expectation that the government will pay the owner of the bond the amount of money that appears in the paper once the bond reaches maturity.
The federal government can increase its revenue through rises in taxes of the reduction in the federal interest rate in order to comply with the payment of the bonds. Therefore, the Federal Government should be allowed to use credit.
Rollo the Walker
B.
Eric the Red
C.
Charles the Simple
D.
Pepin the Short Which Viking explorer sailed west from Iceland and set up a colony on a large land mass that he called Greenland?
Answer:
Eric the Red did it so the answer is B.
This question is based on the accompanying documents. The question is designed to test your
ability to work with historical documents. Some of these documents have been edited for the
purposes of this question. As you analyze the documents, take into account the source of each
document and any point of view that may be presented in the document.
Historical Context:
Throughout history, autocratic leaders have exercised authority over their countries
and the lives of their people. The actions of autocratic leaders have both helped and
hurt their countries and their peoples. Examples of such leaders include Emperor
Shi Huangdi, Czar Peter the Great, and King Louis XIV.
Task: Using the information from the documents and your knowledge of global history,
answer the questions that follow each document in Part A. Your answers to the
questions will help you write the Part B essay in which you will be asked to
Select two leaders mentioned in the historical context and for each
• Describe actions taken by the leader that show this individual was an autocrat
• Discuss the extent to which this leader’s use of autocratic power helped and/or
hurt his country or his people
Answer:
Zhou dynasty, Wade-Giles romanization Chou, dynasty that ruled ancient China for some eight centuries, establishing the distinctive political and cultural characteristics that were to be identified with China for the next two millennia. The beginning date of the Zhou has long been debated. Traditionally, it has been given as 1122 BCE, and that date has been successively revised as scholars have uncovered more archaeological evidence. The most recent findings have placed the outright start of the dynasty at 1046 BCE. The dynasty ended in 256 BCE.
Explanation:
your welcome
Answer:
Is this A P E X right?
Explanation:
B. The need for nuclear weapons led to less sophisticated rocket technology.
C. American and Soviet scientific cooperation lessened political tension.
D. Competition with the Soviet Union spurred American space missions.
Competition with the Soviet Union spurred American space missions.
Answer:
Competition with the Soviet Union spurred American space missions.
Explanation:
Answer:
Regarding the case of Daugert vs. Pappas; the Supreme Court must be informed that John Pappas and his firm were found guilty of malpractice, due to extra temporal request to review an appeal, on a case that was previously ruled in favor of his former client. His negligence conducted to his former client to assume costs, previously overruled by the Court. Main considerations for this case evaluation were the chances of the appeal reversion, as estimated by the Jury
Explanation:
Background
The attorney John Pappas was working for Mountain Development Company (MDC). Black Mountain Ranch (BMR), a commercial entity, bought a recreation complex from MDC. Several deficiencies appeared in the construction and both parties tried to resolved who should be in charge of repairing costs, without agreement.
As a solution, both proposed an agreement, with an external advisor evaluating the situation (Anvil Corporation). When Anvil concluded its investigation, indicated that all defects were caused by a faulty design made by MDC. MDC then rejected those findings, and also, refused to pay for the corrections. To this, BMR responded with a lawsuit against MDC, indicating an agreement breach.
At the end of trial, the Court assigned the blame not to MDC, but BMR, pointing that lack of maintenance resulted in degradation of the infrastructure. BMR then filed an appeal, indicating that, since there was no wrong intention proved, the agreement was biding.
MDC asked its attorney, John Pappas, to request a review to the Court; but this request was presented a day after finishing the valid period to receive the request. Considering this, the developer lost any chance of defending themselves against the appeal, and the Court failed in favor of BMR.
Summarizing, the lawsuit that initially was provided by Court in favor of MCD, was later lost because their attorney did not requested a review, in the given time.
As consequence, MCD, represented by Larry Daugert, presented a suit against Pappas, alleging malpractice.
Daugert vs. Pappas.
Pappas and his firm were accused by Daugert of breach of duty, causing MDC to lost a case that was ruled in their favor, due to an extra temporal appeal review request.
During trial, allegations were made based on the chances of dismissal of the appeal if the review request would have been accepted. Judge considered this an issue to be ruled by Jury, indicating them that:
Finally, the Jury calculated in 20% the changes of the Supreme Court to review and reverse the appeal, meaning that Daugert was able to prove malpractice performed by Pappas.
Main elements resulting of this trial
The main element used to rule malpractice is how close are the actions of the professional to create a negative result for its customer (proximity cause). On this case, the attorney failed to present a review in time, affecting his customer. This is the main justification provided to fail against Pappas, and used to define malpractice.
Also, considering that requesting the Jury to provide probabilities of the scenarios indicated by the Judge could have been considered out of rule, this was made in base of the client’s needs, and the legal profession. This, in order to provide a perspective of this proximity cause, for the Jury.
The question refers to the citation of a specific legal case from the Supreme Court of Washington. This is a Law question appropriate for a College level student. The mentioned case, along with others, are used as precedents to shape legal investigations and decisions.
The Larry Daugert, Trustee for David M. Simms & Gail Simms versus John D. Pappas & Betty Pappas case, which was presented to the Supreme Court of Washington in 1985, and is listed in both volume 104, page 254, of the Washington Reports, Second Series, and in volume 704, page 600, of the Pacific Reporter, Second Series, is a notable reference for various legal arguments. This case, along with others such as Maricopa County, 415 U.S. 250 (1974); Attorney Gen. of New York v. Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898 (1986); and Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana, 436 U.S. 371 (1978), helps form a broader context within the field of law. Each court case contributes to the evolving interpretation of laws and constitutional rights that continually shape our legal system.
#SPJ3
Hello, the answer is A. Metallic