Answer:
Total overheads assigned to order = $203,621.36
Explanation:
As for the information provided:
Payroll = = $76.74 per hour
Setups = = $1,000 per setup
Material Handling = = $12 per barrel.
Quality Control = $430 per inspection.
Other overhead = = $50 per machine hour.
Details of current product requirement: And the related expense shall be :
28 setups = 28 $1,000 = $28,000
720 barrels = 720 $12 = $8,640
90 inspections = 90 $430 = $38,700
1,700 machine hours = 1,700 $50 = $85,000
564 labor hours = 564 $76.74 = $43,281.36
Total overheads assigned to order = $203,621.36
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
On July 15:
Purchase A/c Dr $97,020
To Accounts payable $97,020
(By buying goods on credit with discount), the following are shown in the estimates of tire sales following application of the discount:
= Number of tires × price per tire - discount rate
= 2,200 tires × $45 - 2%
= $99,000 - $1,980
= $97,020
On July 23:
Account payable A/c Dr $97,020
To Cash A/c $97,020
(Being payment is made)
On August 15:
Account payable A/c Dr $97,020
Interest expense A/c Dr $1,980
To Cash A/c $99,000
(Being payment is made on late interval)
The question seeks the computed depreciation for a machine for 5 years under three methods: straight-line, units-of-production, and double-declining balance. The computations were conducted using the provided data.
To answer this question, we first need to understand the terms constant that would be used throughout the computation: Machine cost, residual value, useful life, and productive life. In this scenario, the calculation would be as follows:
Straight-line depreciation distributes the cost equally across the useful lifespan. The units-of-production method bases depreciation on the amount of production output. The double-declining balance method is an accelerated depreciation method that doubles the straight-line rate and uses the remaining book value for its calculations.
The cost of the machine is $1,567,500, and the residual value at the end of five years would be $82,500. Hence, the depreciable amount would be ($1,567,500 - $82,500) = $1,485,000.
For each of the desired methods, the depreciation schedules would be as follows:
#SPJ2
Answer: = $168
Explanation:
Destin Company had a $1,000 income in 2014 but also a temporary difference of $160.
This means that they were taxed on the income less the temporary difference.
= 1,000 - 160
= $840
Tax Expense = 840 * 20%
= $168
Analyze the inventory accounts to determine:
1. Cost of raw materials purchased during the year.
2. Cost of goods manufactured for the year.
3. Cost of goods sold for the year.
4. Cost of raw materials purchased during the year.
Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
True Fit incurred total manufacturing costs of $24.500.000. Of this amount. $3,000,000 was direct materials used and $16, 800,000 was direct labor. Beginning balances for the year were Raw Materials Inventory. $900,000. Work-in-Process Inventory. $600,000; and Finished Goods Inventory. $1, 300,000. At the end of the year, balances were Raw Materials inventory. $800,000; Work-in-Process Inventory. $1, 700,000; and Finished Goods inventory. $390,000.
1) Raw material used= beginning inventory + purchases - ending inventory
3,000,000= 900,000 + purchases - 800,000
2,900,000= purchases
2) cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP
cost of goods manufactured= 600,000 + 24,500,000 - 1,700,000= $23,400,000
3) COGS= beginning finished inventory + cost of goods manufactured - ending finished inventory
COGS= 1,300,000 + 23,400,000 - 390,000= $24,310,000
Product: XV-1
Descriptions Quantity Cost Rate Subtotal Total
Direct materials
Aluminum 4 pounds $25/pound $100
PVC 1 pound 40/pound 40
Direct labor 5 hours 40/hour 200
Variable factory overhead 5 hours 12/hour 60
Total variable manufacturing cost $400
Fixed factory overhead 5 hours 24/hour 120 120
Standard manufacturing cost per unit $520
Standard variable selling and administrative cost per unit I pound 50
* Budgeted fixed factory overhead cost = $120,000
Assume that Schmidt Machinery Company had the standard costs reflected in Exhibit 14.5. In a given month, the company used 3,470 pounds of aluminum to manufacture 935 units. The company paid $28.90 per pound during the month to purchase aluminum. At the beginning of the month, the company had 54 pounds of aluminum on hand. At the end of the month, the company had only 34 pounds of aluminum in its warehouse. Schmidt used 4,400 direct labor hours during the month, at an average cost of $41.90 per hour.
Required:
Compute for the month the following variances:
1. The purchase-price variance for aluminum. Indicate whether this variance is favorable (F) or unfavorable (U).
2. The usage variance for aluminum. Indicate whether this variance is favorable (F) or unfavorable (U).
3. The direct labor rate variance. Indicate whether this variance is favorable (F) or unfavorable (U).
4. The direct labor efficiency variance. Indicate whether this variance is favorable (F) or unfavorable (U).
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
1. Purchase price variance
Standard price per pound = $25
Actual price per pound = $28.9
Quantity of aluminium purchased = Closing inventory + Quantity used - Opening inventory
= 34 + 3,470 - 54
= 3,450 pounds
Purchase price variance = (Standard price - Actual price) × Quantity purchased
= ($25 - $28.9) × 3,450
= -$3.9 × 3,450
= $13,455 (U)
2. Usage variance
Standard quantity of Aluminium for actual production
= 935 units × 4 pounds each
= 3,740 pounds
Usage variance = (Standard quantity of material used - Actual quantity used) × Standard price per unit
= (3,740 - 3,470) × $25
= 270 × $25
= $6,750 (F)
3. Direct labor rate variance
= (Standard rate per hour - Actual rate per hour)
× Actual hours for production
= ($40 - $41.9) × 4,400
= -$1.9 × 4,400
= $8,360 (U)
4. Efficiency variance
Standard hours for actual production
= 935 units × 5 per hour
=4,675 hours
Labor efficiency variance = (Standard hours for actual production - Actual hours for actual production) × Standard rate per hour
= (4,675 - 4,400) × $40
= 275 × $40
= $11,000 (F)
Answer:
4.76% and 0.5
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Average borrowing rate is
= Cost of debt capital ÷ (1 - tax rate)
= 3% ÷ (1 - 0.37)
= 4.76%
And, the market beta is
Cost of equity = Risk free rate of return + Beta × (Market risk premium - risk free rate of return)
5% = 2.5% + Beta × 5%
So, the beta is 0.5
The (Market risk premium - risk free rate of return) is also known as market risk premium
The average pre-tax borrowing rate for Abbott Laboratories is 4.8%. The market beta cannot be calculated without additional information.
The computations for the average pre-tax borrowing rate and market beta for Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT) require different approaches. The estimate provided in the question, 3.0%, is an after-tax cost of debt capital so to find the pre-tax cost of debt, we need to adjust this rate for the tax impact. You would use the formula: pre-tax cost of debt = after-tax cost of debt / (1 - tax rate). Plugging the given values in, we get:
3.0% / (1 - 0.37) = 4.76%,
rounded to 4.8%.
As for the market beta, additional information would be needed that was not provided in the question, such as the covariance of ABT's stock return with the return on the overall market, and the variance of the market's return. Because of this, the market beta cannot be calculated with the provided information. This underlines the importance of clear and detailed information in solving financial analysis problems.
#SPJ3