Answer:
Many factors cause the stock price to increase or decrease. A company's earnings decide its stock values. Some of the company factors which affect the share prices are the announcement about the dividends, employee layoffs and the introduction of new products. Industry performance and investor sentiments are other major factors that affect a company's stock prices. Economic factors are also responsible for fluctuations in stock prices, factors such as inflation, deflation, and changes in economic policies.
A stock's price can be influenced by numerous factors, including the financial performance of the company, current economic conditions, investor sentiment, industry trends, and news events relating to the company or industry.
Several factors can affect a stock's price on the market. These factors include the company's financial performance, economic conditions, investor sentiment, industry trends, and any news or events relating to the company or its industry.
First, the company's financial performance, including its revenues, profits, debts, and overall financial health, can affect its stock price. If the company reports good financial results, its stock price can rise. Conversely, if it reports poor results, its stock price can fall.
Second, economic conditions, such as the state of the economy, interest rates, and inflation rates, can also influence a stock's price. For example, in a strong economy, companies generally perform well, which can boost their stock prices.
Third, investor sentiment—the overall mood or attitude of investors towards the market or a particular stock—can also impact a stock's price. If investors feel positive about a company or the market, they are more likely to buy its stock, driving up its price.
Finally, industry trends and news events can also impact a stock's price. If the industry a company is in is growing or if there is positive news about the company, its stock price could increase. On the contrary, negative news can cause a drop in the stock price.
#SPJ6
differ in their view of the role of laws in a democracy?
Answer:
In 1649, a civil war broke out over who would rule England: Parliament or King Charles I. The war ended with the beheading of the king. Shortly after Charles was executed, an English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679), wrote The Leviathan, a defense of the absolute power of kings.
Explanation:
Cleisthenes
Caesar Augustus
Plato
Answer: A: **CAESAR AUGUSTUS**
Explanation: Reviewing pre-test right now
www.weegy.com?r=UGIJRBMZ
is where I got my answers (answered within minutes if the question was not already asked & 91.3% on my pre-test with 34 questions)
Here is information to support either side:
Federalists - Federalists were individuals who believed that the United States needed the federal government to have more power than the state government. One of the major reason behind this idea is the lack of success underneath the Articles of Confederation. This was America's first constitution and it was highly ineffective. This was ineffective due to the lack of power held by the federal government.
Anti-Federalists- Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, felt that state governments should have more power than federal government. Anti-Federalists feared that a strong federal govenrment would infringe upon the rights of its citizens.
The power of the Roman consuls, elected officers of the Roman Republic, was checked by other political institutions such as the Plebian Assembly and the Centuriate Assembly. Consuls also had a term limit, serving only for one year, which prevented permanent leadership. Their power was also often overshadowed by the influence of ambitious military leaders and societal elites.
The Roman consuls, elected officials of the Roman Republic, were limited in their power in various ways. For example, though consuls had authority, their power was checked by institutions like the Plebian Assembly and the Centuriate Assembly. The Plebian Assembly could elect tribunes, and officers who had the power to veto actions harmful to plebeians - a significant part of Rome's citizens. Similarly, the Centuriate Assembly held the sole power to declare war and also had jurisdiction over foreign policy. These assemblies ensured a certain level of democratization in the otherwise oligarchic Roman political system. Furthermore, consuls could be blocked by the Senate, which held significant influence over financial and foreign affairs.
Moreover, another constraint on consuls' power was their term limit. The consuls held office for only one year, preventing permanent dictatorship. Additionally, they had to work in tandem with their co-consul, and any misuse of power could lead to conflict between the two, bringing about a deadlock in decision-making.
In the complex dynamics of Roman politics, consuls' power was also limited by the individual ambition and influence of military leaders and elite society members. There were episodes in Roman history where powerful leaders like Marius, Sulla, and later Julius Caesar used their military successes to gain immense influence, overshadowing the consular authority.
Answer:
1.) Rio Grande
2.) Yukon River
3.) Makenzie River
4.) Peace River
5.) Mississippi River
Explanation:
I hope i could help! Good luck!