Hazing is considered a form of violence regardless of consent from all parties involved. This is because hazing can cause physical, emotional, and psychological harm. Voluntary participation doesn't negate the potential for violence or harm in hazing. FALSE
The assertion that hazing is not violence because all parties involved are voluntary is false. Hazing is often characterized by activities that may cause physical, emotional, or psychological harm, and therefore it falls under the category of violence. It's important to understand that even if every individual involved in hazing provides their consent, this doesn't negate the potential for harm or violence, as many people might feel coerced or pressured into participating due to social dynamics. The voluntary participation does not make the acts of hazing non-violent.
#SPJ6
the answer I believe to be is B
b. carbon dioxide
c. nitrogen
d. hydrogen
When these dead skin cells don't split away from the skin routinely enough, they can gather in the hair follicles on our skin, otherwise known as pores.
Explanation:
The cells in the shallow or upper layers of skin, known as the epidermis, are continually supplanting themselves. This procedure of restoration is fundamentally peeling (shedding) of the epidermis. The cells in the shallow or upper layers of skin, known as the epidermis, are continually supplanting themselves. This procedure of reestablishment is fundamentally peeling (shedding) of the epidermis.
Despite the fact that singular cells inside the skin occasionally dead and are supplanted with new cells, the scar collagen remains. Up until now, you've concentrated on the epidermis, which is the for the most part dead, top layer of your skin. Under the epidermis is a thicker second layer of skin with a ton all the more going on. This layer is known as the dermis.