The experiments 'The Iced Tea Debate' and 'The Salty Soup' illustrate different physical changes and energy transfers in the context of the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy.
In 'The Iced Tea Debate', the independent variable could be the temperature of the tea, the dependent variable could be how quickly the ice melts and the control variable could be the amount of tea used in each trial. The Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy states that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed in an isolated system. In this case, the ice melting is a physical change, and the energy transferred is thermal energy from the tea to the ice.
In 'The Salty Soup,' the independent variable could be the amount of salt added, the dependent variable could be the taste of the soup, and the control variable could be the type of soup used. The added salt dissolving into the soup is a physical change, and no noticeable energy transfer occurs.
One example of conservation of matter and energy in everyday life is the process of photosynthesis in plants. The plant absorbs sunlight (energy), carbon dioxide, and water, and converts them into glucose and oxygen, thus conserving matter and energy.
#SPJ5
In these demonstrations, matter and energy were conserved, as total mass and energy stayed constant. Significant phase and energy transformations were observed, like the melting of ice and the dissolving of salt. The total mass before and after the transformations remained the same, demonstrating the law of conservation of mass.
Matter and energy can be described as being conserved in a variety of systems because they can neither be created nor destroyed, only transferred between objects or converted from one form to another. In 'The Iced Tea Debate' and 'The Salty Soup' demonstrations,
Variables would include: Independent variable: the substance added (be it ice tea or salt); Dependent variable: physical and chemical changes observed; Control variables: the initial conditions of the system, like temperature and pressure.
When analyzing the results of each of these demonstrations, you should observe energy transfers, in the form of heat in both scenarios.
Moreover, there would be conservation of matter observable in both scenarios. This can be proven by extracting and weighing all substances before and after their reactions, summing up the total mass, which should stay constant.
To answer the questions:
#SPJ3
Answer : The mass of iodine extracted can be 9796.7 mg
Explanation : Given,
Mass of thryoxine = 15.0 g
Molar mass of thryoxine = 776.86 g/mole
The molecular formula of thryoxine is,
In compound, there are 15 moles of carbon, 11 moles of hydrogen, 1 mole of nitrogen, 4 moles of oxygen and 4 moles of iodine.
First we have to determine the moles of thryoxine.
Now we have to determine the moles of iodine.
As, 1 mole of thryoxine has 4 moles of iodine
So, 0.0193 mole of thryoxine has moles of iodine
Now we have to determine the mass of iodine.
conversion used : (1 g = 1000 mg)
Therefore, the mass of iodine extracted can be 9796.7 mg
The total number of moles of CO₂ added to the tank before it is used for paintball is 7.73 moles.
A mole of a substance is that containing 6.022 * 10^23 molecules of that substance
A 340 gm sample of carbon dioxide
Molecular weight = 44
Moles added to the tank = mass/ molecular meight
Moles added to the tank = 340 /44
= 7.73 moles
The total number of moles of CO₂ added to the tank before it is used for paintball is 7.73 moles.
To know more about mole
#SPJ2