Answer:
The Rorschach test has failed as a predictive tool for behaviour.
Several studies have been skeptic towards the test. Firstly, there is no proof in literature that the results are reliable. It is also believed that the correlations might be illusive or false, as occured with experiments to determine homosexuality in the 1960's (which are not valid anymore). Finally, test results among different researchers have not been consistent.
The grammatical name of the given phrase is a dependent clause and the function of this dependent clause is to provide additional information about the specific time and activity.
The phrase "while I was watching a nine o'clock television network program" is known as a dependent clause in grammar.
This dependent clause's purpose is to offer details about the precise function and activity (watching television) in which the speaker was involved. To make the sentence and form a complete notion, it is missing a major clause. It must be joined to an independent clause to form a full sentence.
Learn more about dependent clauses here:
#SPJ5
*disapproval
*rejection
*anger
The correct answers are:
One can immediately spot a strong similarity between the words "Disapprobation" and "Disapproval", and they are in fact related to one another, as disapprobation is defined as "total disapproval or condemn".
Knowing the definition of both disapproval and rejection, it is possible to point out a clear connection between the two, making them both members of the definition of disapprobation.
Another key element to spot would be the dis- prefix, which means "apart" or "away", which carries part of the meaning of these three words.
disapproval
rejection
Answer:
Rhetoric is the correct answer. APEX
Explanation:
Two weeks later, when I arrived for my first day on the job, I discovered that my editor had been called away for a family emergency. I also learned that the state education department had announced that aid typically allocated to school districts in the area would not come through that year. This would be a blow to schools that had relied on funding to keep art, music, and sports programs running.
Since Monday was press day, I needed to do all my reporting and have the story written by the end of the day. John told me that the fastest way to get reactions and comments from everyone involved was to go to the schools and talk directly to the principals, teachers, and parents. No one would be in their offices today. I jotted down the list of people that I should speak to and set out to cover my first story. On my way to the first school, my mind raced. I wasn’t completely sure what I was supposed to be asking besides how the budget cuts would affect each school. As I tried to think of the kind of information that families in the community would want to know, I realized the answer was simple Reporter 101: Who? What? Where? When? Why? and How? If I went back to the office with answers to all of these questions, I would be able to write a complete article.
I made the rounds, hitting elementary, middle, and high schools. As I spoke to the people who ran these schools, I learned so much about what goes into keeping a school’s doors open and all the work that goes into offering students a solid education. It made me think that my new job as a reporter was going to be easy in comparison. By the time I finished up, I’d gotten a crash course in interviewing and had received an interesting range of opinions about the budget cuts. I was already thinking about how I would open the story when I got back to the office. My last step before writing was to get comments from the governor’s office and do some research on past years when state aid was in jeopardy.
The next day I saw my very first news story in print. My editor was happy with it when he returned, and over the next few months, I learned a great deal from him about how to cover a story well, how to handle my sources, and how to make a boring story seem interesting. Fortunately, after fine-tuning the state budget, the governor’s office was able to reinstate the aid money for area school districts. And thanks to my first story, I’d already met most of the school administrators in person and had the beginnings of an actual list of sources for future stories.
Which excerpt from the story best supports the inference that the narrator’s editor becomes a mentor to her?
A. “He was happy with the few writing samples I’d brought to the interview and offered me the job on the spot.”
B. “And thanks to my first story, I’d already met most of the school administrators in person . . . ”
C. “ . . . I learned a great deal from him about how to cover a story well . . . ”
D. “My editor was happy with it when he returned . . . ”
Answer:
C. “ . . . I learned a great deal from him about how to cover a story well . . . ”
Explanation:
A mentor is someone who is more experienced at a particular subject matter and who wants to help a less experienced or knowledgeable person improve. He is similar to a tutor, and his role can be very important when it comes to transforming the way the less experienced person operates. In this case, we can tell that the editor will be a good mentor because the protagonist seems to have learned a lot about him, including how to cover a story, how to make it more interesting and how to handle sources.
The answer is A
Hope that helped ^^
Answer: shifts to the defendant.
Explanation: The plaintiff usually has the burden of proving negligence. If the injury or damage wouldn’t ordinarily have occurred if reasonable care had been exercised, and if the defendant had exclusive control over the cause of the injury, however, (the burden of proof shifts to the defendant. This shift is called res ipsa loquitur), which is Latin for “the thing speaks for itself.” This sometimes can be the case in medical malpractice. PF