4a^2(b^2-c)+2ab(ab-c)-ac(a+2b)
Answer:
A. 25%
25% is equivalent to 1/4 and when you multiply 75 by 4 you get 300. Which means 75 is equivalent to 1/4 and 1/4 is equivalent to 25%. So the answer is 25%. I'm so sorry if this explanation is bad
Answer:
y = - x +
Step-by-step explanation:
the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is
y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )
given the line with equation
y = - x + 7 ← in slope- intercept form
with slope m = -
• Parallel lines have equal slopes , then
y = - x + c ← is the partial equation of the parallel line
to find c, substitute the point (3, 3 ) for x/ y into the partial equation
3 = - (3) + c = - + c ( add to both sides )
+ = c , that is
c =
y = - x + ← equation of parallel line
The equation of the line passing through point (3,3) and parallel to y = -(1/6)x + 7 is y = -(1/6)x + 3.5, which is achieved by knowing that parallel lines have the same slope and substituting the coordinates of the given point into the y = mx + b (slope-intercept form) and solving for the y-intercept 'b'.
The question asks for an equation of a line that is parallel to the equation y = -(1/6)x + 7 and also passes through the point (3,3). First, it's significant to understand that parallel lines share the same slope. Looking at the equation y = -(1/6)x + 7, we can see that the slope, or 'm' value, is -1/6. Therefore, the slope of our new line will also be -1/6. The conventional form of the equation for a line is y = mx + b where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Since we know the slope and have a point that lies on the line, we can substitute these values into this formula to solve for 'b'.
Here's how we do it:
First, substitute the point's coordinates into the equation for the line: 3 = (-1/6)*3 + b
This simplifies to: 3 = -1/2 + b
Then solving for 'b', we get: b = 3 + 1/2 = 3.5
Therefore, the equation of our new line that is parallel to the original line and passes through the point (3,3) is y = -(1/6)x + 3.5.
Learn more about Equation of a parallel line here:
#SPJ11
It looks like we have
and we want to find .
Since is approaching 5, we don't care about the value of when .
We do care about how behaves to either side of . If from below, then , so that
On the other hand, if from above, then , so that
The one-sided limits do not match, since 0 ≠ 8, so the limit does not exist.
(3, 5)
(5, 5)
(6, 5)
(5,5)
(3,5)
Answer:
(5,5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that B has coordinates as (3,7) When reflected about a line the new coordinates are (3,5)
This implies that by reflection x coordinate remains the same but y reduced by 2 units.
Apply the same logic for unknown O.
C is reflected to O.
Original coordinates of C are (5,7)
Hence new coordinates i.e. that of O would be
x coordinate same as 5
y coordinate 2 less = 7-2 = 5
COordinates of O are (5,5)