In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the Court ruled that symbolic speech, like wearing armbands as a form of protest, is __________.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), the Court ruled that symbolic speech, like wearing armbands as a form of protest, is protected by the first amendment.

What was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)?

  • In 1965, a community school district in Iowa suspended three teenagers for wearing black armbands to highschool to protest the war.
  • Their families filed suit, and in 1969 the case reached the Supreme Court.
  • The Court ruled that the school district had violated the students’ free speech rights. The armbands were a type of symbolic speech, which the first Amendment protects.

Thus the answer is Protected by the first amendment.

To learn more about supreme court, refer: brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:  A. symbolic speech

Explanation: eat my dang nots

(pls mark me brainliest)


Related Questions

Which person has an earth-based religion?
The British Parliament divided the Indian sub-continent into two nations in 1947. This was a result of
.Which of the following statements describes a result of the development of canals in the early 1800's?
Why were more Americans able to buy luxury items such as cars during the 1920s?A) Families were pooling their money together to buy high-priced items. B) Mass production techniques reduced manufacturing costs and therefore reduced the prices for consumers. C) Jobs were paying higher wages due to the large number of labor strikes following the war. D) The government was assisting families of low-income status in order to buy necessities.
Which of the following actions was supported by both the Fourteen Points and Paris Peace Conference agreements?A. Limiting the total size of militaries in countries around the world B. Forcing Germany to pay other countries for starting world war I C. Protecting the right of self-determination for citizens in Germany's colonies D. Creating the League of Nations to help prevent future wars

What aspect of instruments was improved during the Romantic period?

Answers

Valves on instruments were improved during the romantic period.

Answer:

What aspect of instruments improved during the Romantic period?

 

Strings

 

Wood choice

 

Piano keyboards

 

Valves

Explanation:

Valves

What was the capital of the Byzantine empire

Answers

Constantinople was the capital of the Byzantine Empire 

Answer:

A. Constantinople

Explanation:

Which statement best describes the economy of India in the late 1700s?In the late 1700s, British farmers produced cotton that was shipped to Indian factories to produce textiles.

In the late 1700s, Indian farmers produced cotton that was shipped to British factories to produce textiles.

In the late 1700s, taxes were lowered to promote struggling manufacturing and trade industries in India.

In the late 1700s, taxes were raised to gain revenue from the growing manufacturing industries in I

Answers

Answer:

  • In the late 1700s, Indian farmers produced cotton that was shipped to British factories to produce textiles.

Explanation:

Amid the late 1700s, farmers in India delivered cotton and sent them to certain industrial facilities in the British nations to create materials. In this century, the development of India from exchanging and agrarian culture to an economy of administrations and assembling was the financial history of India. Be that as it may, India was as yet ready to get by on their farming.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

  • In the late 1700s, Indian farmers produced cotton that was shipped to British factories to produce textiles.

Why would people react to a program like the great society with fear?

Answers

Answer:

People would react with fear to a program like the Great Society because these programs might raise taxes.

Explanation:

The Great Society was a large-scale social policy reform program run by the federal government under President Lyndon B. Johnson, who served from 1963 to 1969. The program was proclaimed in early 1964, a few months after Johnson took over the presidency after the murder of his predecessor John F. Kennedy, and continued until the end of his term in the White House in January 1969. The main objectives of the reform program were to fight poverty, strengthen the rights of African Americans and other minorities, and to implement comprehensive reforms in the areas of education and health. Environmental and consumer protection and the expansion of the infrastructure were further considerations.

The truth is that all these programs implied a considerable increase in public spending, with huge budget items that would be destined to cover these social expenses. Therefore, a large part of American society (especially Republicans and conservatives in general) feared that these programs could significantly raise taxes. For this reason, many of the representatives of these groups opposed the implementation of the Great Society.

“Our prosperity rests on the basic [beliefs] that the work of free individuals makes a nation—and it is the job of Government to help them do the best they can... that our greatest resource is the health and skills and knowledge of our people... that older Americans... are entitled to live out their lives in dignity... that individual farmers and individual workers have a right to some protection against those forces which might deprive them of a decent income from the fruits of their labor.”According to Johnson, the primary role of government is to

A protect older Americans.
B provide a decent income.
C support individual effort.
D conserve resources.

Answers

According to Johnson, the primary role of government is to support individual effort. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". The other choices can be easily negated. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your great help.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott proved that ?

Answers

The Montgomery Bus Boycott proved that the laws of Alabama and Montgomery regarding segregation on buses unconstitutional. This ruling was given by the United States Supreme Court. This was a big decision regarding the abolition of discrimination based of race and color of skin. This boycott lasted from 5th December 1955 to 21st December 1956. 

The Montgomery Bus Boycott proved that nonviolent resistance could be a powerful tool for challenging and overturning racial segregation and discrimination in society.

Segregation refers to the enforced separation of different racial or ethnic groups, often with the intention of maintaining social, economic, and political inequalities.

In the context of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, segregation specifically refers to the practice of racial separation on public buses, where African Americans were subjected to discriminatory policies, such as being forced to sit in the back or give up their seats to white passengers.

The boycott was a response to this systemic segregation, and its success highlighted the injustice of segregation laws and paved the way for subsequent civil rights advancements in the United States.

Learn more about racial Segregation here:

brainly.com/question/29768584

#SPJ6