A market where tenants negotiate rent and other terms with property owners or their managers is referred to as a "User market".
Option: B
Explanation:
A market analyst is more generalized than research involving consumers. Market analysts are studying customer behavior, and recognizing their needs. They disclose demographic, fiscal, and statistical data about a particular sector. The data was used by both industry analysts and consumer analysts to make informed decisions.
Here the tenant is bargaining or trying to get compensated the amount of rent to be paid monthly, by discussing the topic with property owner is understood as user market, because according to user need or demand the landlord may get agree to understand the user concern.
The corporate social responsibility is the task of every individual in the corporation to balance between economy and the ecosystems. It is related to the triple bottom line because it includes social, environmental and financial responsibility.
Self improvement plans usually take too long to show results
b.
Self improvement plans almost never succeed and are a waste of time
c.
Self improvement plans require people to admit they need improvement
d.
Self improvement plans are too expensive for most people
Self improvement plans require people to admit they need improvement it is difficult to start a self improvement plan. Thus, option (c) is correct.
The term self improvement plan refers to the plan as the creation of the life as for yourself. Self improvement plans were the based on the planning for personal development, reflection, values, goal-setting and the awareness. It was the creation of the basis of priorities and the perspective basis.
According to the self improvement plan, was the requirement of people to admit they require improvement is the main difficulty. Self-improvement is the betterment of one's cognition, position, or lineament by one's own attempts.
As a result, the significance of the Selfimprovement plans as the difficulties are the aforementioned. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on selfimprovement plans, here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
C
Explanation:
deductions
unknown
contributions
The correct answer is B. Deductions.
Explanation
A wage is a term used to refer to the salary or money a person receives in exchange for work. This is paid by the company or employer every certain tie. Additionally, after the development of the rights and duties of the workers, wages changed, this includes the fact nowadays the workers must pay deductions which are amounts of money withheld to cover benefits such as health insurance, education, pension funds, or some obligations such as taxes. So, the correct answer is B. Deductions.
Amounts withheld from your gross wage are deductions.
3. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract existsone party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract). Medtronic is suing for wrongful interference with a _______.
4. Who are the parties to the initial contract?5. _____is the third party who knew about the contract.
6. St. Jude learned about the contract and noncompete clause between Hughes and Medtronic from _____.
7. It is _____that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to breach his contract with Medtronic.
8. St. Jude ______before he left Medtronic.
9. What did St. Jude represent regarding the noncompete clause? That it ____enforceable.
10. Was the noncompete clause enforceable? 11. Did it matter if the clause was unenforceable? 12. Based on these facts, does it appear that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to break his contract with Medtronic?
13. Is Hughes liable for intentional interference with a contract?
15. Hughes is _______to be held liable for breach of contract.
16. If St. Jude had informed Hughes that the noncompete clause was enforceable and Hughes still left to come to work for them, would St. Jude be liable for intentional interference with a contract?
Answer:
YES
Because by definition, wrongful interference occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party causing economic harm
Explanation:
Did wrongful interference occur and if so, which type of wrongful interference occurred?
YES
Because by definition, wrongful interference occurs when one person intentionally damages someone else's contractual or business relationships with a third party causing economic harm
1. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract exists one party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract.
2. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract exists one party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract.
3. There is a contract between two parties/ One party is seeking a greater market share for their product/ A third party knows the contract existsone party is targeting the others' customers/ A third party is inducing another to break a contract).
Medtronic is suing for wrongful interference with a contractual business relationship.
4. Who are the parties to the initial contract? Medtronic and James Hughes
5. St. Jude Medical, S.C., Inc is the third party who knew about the contract.
6. St. Jude learned about the contract and noncompete clause between Hughes and Medtronic from James Hughes.
7. It is true that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to breach his contract with Medtronic.
8. St. Jude offered James Hughes a job as a sales director at a significant higher salary before he left Medtronic.
9. What did St. Jude represent regarding the non compete clause? That it was not enforceable.
10. Was the noncompete clause enforceable? YES
11. Did it matter if the clause was unenforceable? YES
12. Based on these facts, does it appear that St. Jude intentionally induced Hughes to break his contract with Medtronic? YES
13. Is Hughes liable for intentional interference with a contract? NO
15. Hughes is NOT to be held liable for breach of contract.
16. If St. Jude had informed Hughes that the noncompete clause was enforceable and Hughes still left to come to work for them, would St. Jude be liable for intentional interference with a contract? NO