Maria’s utility-maximizing point is: 3 salads, 6 vegetarian burgers. Therefore, the correct option is C.
Given information: Each salad costs $6 and each vegetarian burger costs $3. Maria’s weekly food budget is $36.
3 salads cost will be:
= $18
6 vegetarian burgers cost:
= $18
Total cost: $18 + $18 = $36
When Maria is consuming 3 salads and 6 vegetarian burgers, she is spending $36 which is equal to her budget i.e. $36. So, it is Maria’s utility-maximizing point.
The happiness or benefit that a person obtains from consuming a good, using a service, or participating in an activity is referred to as utility. It stands for the arbitrary evaluation of how highly a person values or likes a given option or choice.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about utility here:
#SPJ12
The complete question might be:
For Lunch, Maria Eats Only Salads Or Vegetarian Burgers. Her Weekly Food Budget Is $36. Each Salad Costs $6 And Each Vegetarian Burger Costs $3. When Deciding How Much Of Each Good To Buy, Maria Knows That 2 Salads And 4 Vegetarian Burgers Will Give Her A Utility Of 8. Maria’s Utility-Maximizing Point Is: A. 6 Salads, 1 Vegetarian Burger B. 4 Salads, 6
32. For lunch, Maria eats only salads or vegetarian burgers. Her weekly food budget is $36. Each salad costs $6 and each vegetarian burger costs $3. When deciding how much of each good to buy, Maria knows that 2 salads and 4 vegetarian burgers will give her a utility of 8. Maria’s utility-maximizing point is:
A. 6 salads, 1 vegetarian burger
B. 4 salads, 6 vegetarian burgers
C. 3 salads, 6 vegetarian burgers
D. 2 salads, 8 vegetarian burgers
Answer:
recognize a liability and an expense in its financial statements.
Explanation:
Contingent liability refers to a liability that arises in some unpredictable future event. In this, the amount is expected or predicted.
Here in the question the actual occurrence would be categorized also its amount would be predicted so the same is to be recorded as a liability and recorded as an expense in the financial statement i.e. balance sheet & income statement
Answer:
d. Lack of complexity: This refers to an oversimplication of policies that sacrifices depth and nuance.
Explanation:
Projects dedicated to information security policy are improved by lack of complexity . When the process for project execution is simplified, it is easy to understand and execute the various project stages, making processes more efficient. Simplification is a valuable tool businesses are using more and more to reduce wastage and increase returns.
On the other hand complexity in a project makes it hard to understand, and easier to make time-wasting mistakes.
Answer:
PV= $2,106.18
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Annual payment= $500
Number of periods= 5 years
Interest rate= 6%
To calculate the present value, first, we need to determine the future value:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual payment
FV= {500*[(1.06^5) - 1]} / 0.06
FV= $2,818.55
Now, the present value:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 2,818.55/1.06^5
PV= $2,106.18
The present value of a $500 payment received at the end of each of the next five years at an appropriate discount rate of 6 percent is approximately $2,106.
The question you asked involves the concept of calculating the present value of a series of future payments, also known as an annuity. The present value of an annuity can be determined using the formula:
PV = PMT * [(1 - (1 + r)^-n)/r]
where 'PV' is the present value, 'PMT' is the periodic payment, 'r' is the discount rate (as a decimal), and 'n' is the number of periods.
Plugging in the values from your question we get:
PV = 500 * [(1 - (1 + 0.06)^-5) /0.06]
This will give us the present value of the cash flows. Thus, the present value for a $500 payment received at the end of each of the next five years, worth to you today at the appropriate discount rate of 6 percent is $2,106.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Governance Form.
Explanation:
The buyer has the right to request a copy of several documents, including the Governance Form. This form summarizes the board of directors and unit rights.
Answer:
The government needs to revamp the Social Security program to make it sustainable.
Explanation:
A normative economic statement is always a suggestion for the economy, whereas a descriptive economic statement is a statement providing information, as it states the facts and do not provide any suggestion.
Here, in given instance the statement,
Government needs to improve or form the Social Security Program, so that the program is sustainable, is a suggestion and not a fact.
Thus, it is a normative economic statement.
Among the provided statements, the one suggesting the government needs to revamp the Social Security program to be sustainable is the normative economic statement due to its prescription for improvement.
Normative economics involves judgments and prescriptions for economic policies or outcomes. Among the provided statements, 'The government needs to revamp the Social Security program to make it sustainable' is a normative economic statement. This statement is normative because it is based on value judgments and expresses an opinion on how things should be. It suggests a course of action that ought to be pursued to improve the Social Security program and doesn't merely describe factual aspects of the economy like the rest of the statements do.
#SPJ6
Answer:
the gross profit for the month is $1,180
Explanation:
FIFO Inventory System Sell the Older Inventory Acquired first followed by the Recent Acquired Inventory
Trading Account of Effie Company
Sales (240 units × $10.00) $2,400
Less Cost of Sales :
200 units × $5.00 : $1,000
40 units × $5.50 : $ 220
Total Cost of Sales ( $1,220)
Gross Profit $1,180