Which wartime policy toward Japanese Americans was upheld by the Supreme Court in its 1944 ruling in korematsu v. United States?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The wartime policy that was upheld by the Supreme court was confinement in the internment camp.

In 1944, the US Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Korematsu v. the United States. In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the forceful removal of Japanese Americans from the pacific coast during the Second World War.

Further Explanation

The ruling was considered one of the shameful government decisions in the history of the United States. Many critics felt the forceful relocation of Japanese Americans without any proof of wrongdoing was unlawful.

The president Roosevelt issued an executive order in 1942 after japan attack pearl harbor. The executive order mandated the military to established areas and excludes all American citizens.

In compliance with the executive order, the military authority in charge of controlling the defense of the pacific coast of the United States removed all Japanese Americans and moved them to internment camps.

However, Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American felt his right was violated and approached the courts to challenge the decision of the government. Fred Korematsu challenged the executive order on the basis that it violates the Fifth Amendment to the constitution of the United States.

However, the Supreme Court ruled that the executive order became necessary to protect against spying, which can sabotage the effort of the military during the second World War.

LEARN MORE:

  • Which wartime policy toward Japanese Americans was upheld by the Supreme Court in its 1944 ruling in korematsu v. United State brainly.com/question/10145545
  • Which wartime policy toward Japanese Americans was upheld by the Supreme Court in its 1944 ruling in korematsu v. United States brainly.com/question/1309313

KEYWORDS:

  • supreme court
  • korematsu v. United States
  • japanese americans
  • wartime policy
  • 1944
Answer 2
Answer: The 1944 ruling upheld Executive Order 9066. This was the policy of internment camps that the US followed during WWII, where Japanese Americans were forced to live in secluded "camps" to protect the Allied military effort from potential "spies."

Hope this helps!

Related Questions

Discuss the nature of resistance to apartheid in the period of 1948 to 1958
A sentence about the pilgrims that uses the word dissent.
Why did American settlers in Texas have conflict with the Mexican government during the 1830s? A. American settlers owned slaves, which violated Mexican law. B. The Mexican government insisted that settlers move to territory farther south. C. The Mexican government refused to allow settlers to establish farms or ranches. D. American settlers who were Catholic could not vote or own property.
How many mexican americans won the medal of honor in World war 2?
How does the Internet affect the way people find and exchange information?

In 1970, President Nixon tried to break the stalemate in the peace process by (1 point)pulling U.S. forces out of Cambodia.
helping the Khmer Rouge seize power in Cambodia.
ordering a ground attack on Vietcong bases in Cambodia.
sending economic aid to the Cambodian government.
2. What occurred at My Lai? (1 point)
Vietcong guerrillas surrendered.
U.S. forces suffered a crippling defeat.
Vietnam became unified under one flag.
American soldiers killed hundreds of Vietnamese civilians.

Answers

1. In 1970, President Nixon ordered a ground attack on Vietcong bases in Cambodia. 

Pres. Nixon believed attacking in Cambodia was necessary to forestall communist forces from attacking South Vietnam from that direction. But his decision was unpopular with some senior staff members, who resigned in protest, as well as with the American public, which did not want further escalation of the war.  This was seen as essentially an invasion of Cambodia by the US.

2. At My Lai, American soldiers killed hundreds of Vietnamese civilians.  

More than 500 civilians were killed by US soldiers in what was essentially a massacre. Women and girls were raped also.  It was an instance of soldiers losing control and acting with sheer brutality. The government initially sought to cover up the incident, but the truth came out.  It caused further anti-war sentiment at home in the United States.

During the 20th Century, battle included devastating effects on civilians due to advancements in weaponry. What were examples of the change in weapons? A. Air attacks from planes on non-specific targets but city blocks. B. Submarines were now common. C. Troops carried bayonets as well as guns. D. The use of the first hand grenades.

Answers

"Troops carried bayonets as well as guns" is one example among the choices given in the question that were examples of the change in weapons. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.

After Alexander's death, Greece and Macedonia were ruled by _____.

Answers

King of Macedonia 
hope that this helps you!! 
=)

civilization fought for control of Mesopotamia because; they did not like the people of other tribes they wanted to improve the art in other countries they were interested in rich farmland of fertile crescent

Answers

They fought over control of Mesopotamia because they were interested in the rich farmland of the Fertile Crescent 

5. Why did the United States get pulled into World War I?

Answers

The U.S wanted to remain neutral, based on what Woodrow Wilson wanted, but after Germany started sinking U.S ships, they got included. 

What was a major problem with the central government under the Articles of Confederation?

Answers

The biggest issue with the Articles of Confederation was that it placed virtually all power within the Congress. This Congress had power to draft and pass laws, but the Articles of Confederation had no provisions allowing an executive branch to enforce those laws within the states. Furthermore, there was no central judicial system to interpret disputes about the laws of the Congress. This meant that the Congress simply had no power behind the laws that it passed, which allowed the states simply to ignore any certain laws that weren't in their best interests.

Simply put, the Articles of Confederation created a central government that was far too weak to be of real value.
Anti-Federalists complained that a strong central government would give too much power to the federal government while taking too much power from state and local governments.