HISTORY HIGH SCHOOL

Why did American settlers in Texas have conflict with the Mexican government during the 1830s? A.
American settlers owned slaves, which violated Mexican law.







B.
The Mexican government insisted that settlers move to territory farther south.







C.
The Mexican government refused to allow settlers to establish farms or ranches.







D.
American settlers who were Catholic could not vote or own property.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The best answer here is A, a huge conflict between the Mexican government and American settlers was slavery.  Leading up to the Mexican American War 
(1846-1848), the Mexican government started creating and enforcing more laws surrounding American settlers, as they were becoming very numerous.  Even after the war, slavery was still an issue for settlers in Texas (which became independent after the war) and this contributed to the civil war.  Hope this helps!
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer: A. American settlers owned slaves, which violated Mexican law.

Explanation: I took the test too :3

Related Questions

Why did Truman put limits on MacArthur? He was protecting his position as commander in chief He was being careful of the defense funds allocated by NSC-68 He was avoiding a third world war. He was unhappy that MacArthur moved north of the 38th parallel. He was unhappy that MacArthur was more popular.
Who is richard The lion-hearted
The Columbian Exchange is associated with which new development across the globe
Who were Lewis and Clark? A. surveyors of the nation's capital B. War Hawks who convinced President James Madison to go to war C. leaders of the expedition to explore the Louisiana Territory D. heroes of the War of 1812
What country did hitler invade in 1939, this beginning WWll ?

Write a paragraph explaining why the coming of Jesus into the world is good news.

Answers

A paragraph that explains why the coming of Jesus into the world is a good news.

  • Coming of Jesus into this world is really a good news, because Jesus can help those people that who are in the wrong place. Jesus can evangelize and make those people to go into the right path. Jesus come into this world in order to spread the knowledge of the truth and to save all of us. God the Father bring Jesus down to Earth in order to sacrifice His Son, just to redeem our sins.

When the second coming of Jesus is now started. All of the Christian soul will be raptured. Because the people that who accept the salvation, can bring their soul to the Kingdom of God. When Jesus is coming into this world, all of us will believe that Jesus is alive and real.

Why did the us refused to recognize the people's republic of china as a legitimate nation?

Answers

Simple answer: because they didn't want a communist government ruling over so many people.  They used the excuse that the legitimate government was the one in Taiwan. 

The Erie Canal connected Albany on the Hudson with A. White Plains.
B. Ontario.
C. Buffalo.
D. Lake Superior

Answers

C. Buffalo.

The Erie Canal connected Albany on the Hudson with Buffalo :)

Which defines separation of powers?a. division of governmental powers among leaders
b. division of authority among law enforcement agencies
c. division of military powers among branches of the armed forces
d. division of political power among branches of government

Answers

Answer:  d. division of political power among branches of government.

Context/detail:

The "Separation of Powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory.  The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu.  (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.")  He wrote an important work of political theory called The Spirit of the Laws, published in 1748.

Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.
Your answer is d. division of political power among branches of government.

Reason: Because the separation and branches define the same subject(ive).
And thanks to the branches of government we have as of now,we are politically separated as well.

The result of the Plessy v. Fergusson Supreme Court decision was that segregation laws werea. considered constitutional.
b. now banned in the South.
c. now spread to northern states.
d. considered unconstitutional.

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "c. now spread to northern states." The result of the Plessy v. Fergusson Supreme Court decision was that segregation laws were now spread to northern states.

A peace treaty was signed in Paris by North Vietnam, the Vietcong, South Vietnam, and the United States on January 27, 1973. True False

Answers

yur answer would be true 

hoped it helped
Other Questions
 Write a two-paragraph essay on whether church leaders should be political rulers.
Using diplomacy as a way to end conflicts between nations is one of the function of
The diagram below describes a series of events during the 1700s. A flowchart of four boxes, the ones on the left pointing to the ones on the right. The first box says, British policies limit colonial rights.The second says, Colonies demand political change. The third says, British ignore colonial grievances. The fourth box ? Which action completes the chain of events? A. The American Revolution is concluded B. The Articles of Confederation are overturned C. The Declaration of Independence is approved D. The U.S. Constitution is adopted
Which issue listed in the Declaration of Sentiments was least likely to gain support from most people?A. "He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns."B. "He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education—all colleges being closed against her."C. "He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband[.]"D. "He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise."