I believe that college athletes should not be paid to play. This is because the fact that such athletes are playing in a college team shows that the main purpose of such a team is to encourage the participation of students. Ultimately, the team is a part of the school, and it should be treated as such. By paying them, the team would most likely get further away from the spirit of the school and closer to the dynamics of professional sports.
The other side would most likely claim that the publicty athletes receive, the fans they have and the dedication they put into their game would justify them getting paid like professionals.
Answer:No, college athletes should not be payed to play.
Explanation: They shouldn’t be payed to play because they save so much money from scholarships.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Answer:
what are you trying to ask?
Explanation:
The dot in the letter "i" is referred to as a tittle. It is a little dot that appears above the letters "i" and "j" in several languages.
The tittle distinguishes these letters from other letters that look comparable, such as the letters "l" and "j."
The tittle is said to have originated in the Greek script, where it was used to differentiate between the letters iota and upsilon. The Latin alphabet later adopted the tittle, which is currently used in many other languages, including French, English, and Spanish.
The tittle is still regarded an important element of the letters "i" and "j," and it is frequently employed in formal writing.
Learn more about languages, here:
#SPJ4
That "dot" is called a tittle or a superscript dot . A tittle or a superscript dot is a small distinguishing mark, it shows in the lower case letter(s) i or j. The tittle is an integral part of the glyph of i and j, but diacritic dots can appear over other letter in various languages.