Answer:
The amount that will recognize under amortization expenses is $2600.
Explanation:
The first step here would be to calculate the amortization expenses for the first 4 years of the patent, here will use straight line depreciation method,
Formula - original value of asset / useful life in years
- $26,400 / 12
- $2200
Now for the 4 years this amount would become $2200 x 4 = $8800
The amount of amortization for the first half of 2017 ( up to 30 June ) would be-
= half of full year expenses
= $2200 / 2
= $1100
So up to 30 June 2017, the expenses are $9900 ( $8800+$1100), So the new book value would be = $26,400 - $9900
= $16,500
In this $16,500 we will add the amount of legal fees, so the total would be -
$16,500 + $6000
= $22,500
The next step is to divide this value by remaining useful; years which is 7.5,
$22,500 / 7.5
= $3000
Now we will divide this amount by 2 because we have to take out expense for remaining last 6 months of 2017
$3000 / 2
= $1500
Adding the expenses for first and second half of 2017 to take out total amortization expense of 2017 -
$1100 + $1500
= $2600
Answer:
$2,500,000
Explanation:
Following the stated assumptions in the question, the money multiplier will be used to calculate the resulting effect of the $500,000 injection into the money supply.
The money multiplier formula is 1/r , where r is the required reserve ratio. So, the resulting change in demand deposits is:
Change in Demand Deposits = Change in Fresh Reserves (that is, the Initial Deposit)×1/r
= $500,000×1/0.20
=$500,000 × 5
= $2,500,000
Check all that apply.
a. Challenge Nicola’s position.
b. Keep an open mind.
c. Separate facts from opinions.
d. Assume Nicola is incorrect.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B" and "C": Keep an open mind; Separate facts from opinions.
Explanation:
At the moment of solving different-point-of-view issues, it is important to be open-minded, otherwise, we could only remain with our opinion discarding others' critic point of view that could be useful at the moment of taking decisions. Besides, it does not matter if other individuals are biased since we can separate the facts from those points of view. Separating the facts implies analyzing what others have to say in deep regardless of what their emotions can be about that matter. It implies subtracting an objective idea from a subjective point of view.
To understand Nicola's argument, you should keep an open mind, separate facts from opinions, and instead of jumping to conclusions, enhance your understanding by asking clarifying questions.
To make sure you understand Nicola's argument, you can adopt the following ways:
#SPJ3
Answer:
France
Germany
Explanation:
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
France has a lower opportunity cost in the production of olives compared to Germany.
It means that Germany would have a lower opportunity cost in the production of fish when compared to France.
I hope my answer helps you
France has a comparative advantage in the production of olives because it gives up less fish to produce them than Germany does. Conversely, Germany has a comparative advantage in fish production as it sacrifices less to produce fish than olives.
Comparative advantage is an economic concept that identifies the goods a country can produce in a cost-effective way compared to other countries. In the scenario where France's opportunity cost for producing one crate of olives is 4 pounds of fish and Germany's opportunity cost for the same crate of olives is 10 pounds of fish, we can deduce that France has a comparative advantage in olive production and Germany has a comparative advantage in fish production since it gives up less to produce the same amount of fish as opposed to olives.
#SPJ3
The answers for the subdivisions are given below and are explained. Explanation:
1)
it consists of a table refer the attachment
it has the list of asserts, liabilities and common stock
2)
(i) 32000
(ii) 11000
(iii) 38000
3)
The table in attached, it explains the prepaid expenses , common stock , dividends , insurance expenses , Insurance expenses, Accounts payable, service revenue.
4)
Refer the tables are attached it explains the Accounts receivable, common stock, rent payable. insurance expense , interest revenue and dividends.
5)
1.Equity at the beginning of the year = 27000 - 15000 = 8000
2. Equity at the end of the year 60,000 - 27,000 = 33000
3. Increase in equity = 33000 - 8000 = 25000
Net Income = 25000 + 37300 - 6300 = 56000
4. Common stock = 25000 + 6000 - 1100 = 29900
5. Dividends = 19600 + 19100 - 25000 = 13700
6. Net Income = 25000 + 42900 - 3400 = 64500
Answer:
≈ 9644 quantity of card
Explanation:
given data:
n = 4 regions/areas
mean demand = 2300
standard deviation = 200
cost of card (c) = $0.5
selling price (p) = $3.75
salvage value of card ( v ) = $ 0
The optimal production quantity for the card can be calculated using this formula below
= u + z (0.8667 ) * б
= 9200 + 1.110926 * 400
≈ 9644 quantity of card
First we have to find u
u = n * mean demand
= 4 * 2300 = 9200
next we find the value of Z
Z = ( )
= ( 3.75 - 0.5 ) / 3.75 = 0.8667
Z( 0.8667 ) = 1.110926 ( using excel formula : NORMSINV (0.8667 )
next we find б
б = 200 = 400
Answer:
B. The cost of the building will include the cost of replacing the roof.