Answer:
nonpoint- source pollution
Explanation:
b. professional or amateur.
c. planned or unplanned.
He tries to sleep it off.
Gregor's first reaction when he discovers he has was a malicious program, is a shock and he thought he was able to sleep it off but it becomes real.
Gregor lightly wonders what has befallen him and then tries to fall returned asleep. His calm demeanor indicates that he accepts the unlucky occasions of his lifestyle and as opposed to living on them without delay offers the results.
Learn more about Gregor here: brainly.com/question/24635697
#SPJ2
Answer: he tries to sleep it off
-
Answer: The statement represents the stifling of some of the basic postulates of democracy.
Explanation:
Freedom of speech is characteristic of democratic and civilized states. Freedom, in this sense, is one of the key elements of human freedoms and rights. Freedom of speech is thus only forbidden in autocratic and dictatorial political systems. Freedom of speech also implies freedom of imitation; artists' activity through their works is an element of freedom of speech, i.e., expression. Freedom of speech is important so that I have the right to share my thoughts with others. Therefore, freedom of speech must never be restricted.
a. cost.
b. price.
c. supply.
d. demand
Answer: The answer is No there has not been misappropriation
Explanation:
in this case, there has not been misappropriation because Phillips has not done the needful in the first instance. The two ground in which Phillips has not done the needful to protect his invention are these
1.Philip had not patented his tree stand,a patent right is a right or special privilege granted to an investor who had applied for it to protect such inventor intellectual work and to enable him benefit from the proceed of the invention for a given period of time.such a right confer monopoly on the patentee in the sense that, the patent so granted will enable the individual alone to use the design for a specific number of years no other individual or company will be allowed to use the design as long as the patent is in operation.
2.Philip did not require the investors to sign NDAs, which is known as non disclosure agreement which is an agreement signed between two individuals or companies in order to ensure that the information contained in the agreement do not get to the third parties. It is also used to ensure that the trade secret between two individuals or companies is protected from leaking out. Therefore based on these two grounds Philip has failed to do the needful to protect his invention and has created a loophole for himself which the investors had used to steal his invention and made it theirs. The case instituted against the investors by Philip cannot be proved beyond reasonable doubt by Philip in the court of law that the investors had steal his invention because he had failed to do the needful in the first instance to win the case in his favour.