The Soviet collectivization of agriculture under Joseph Stalin exemplifies a dictatorial government, as it involved the state's control over agricultural production.Strict quotas were set, peasants were forced onto state-run farms, and resistance was brutally suppressed. This led to dire consequences, including the loss of livestock and massive famines.
The Soviet collectivization of agriculture is an example of a dictatorial government as it represents the state's total control over the economy, specifically the agriculture sector. Collectivization, implemented primarily under Joseph Stalin, involved transforming individually owned farms into state-owned entities. By doing so, the government could dictate what and how much to produce, disregarding the needs and welfare of the individual peasants.
Stalin accelerated collectivization in an attempt to meet grain production targets, with little regard for the realities of agricultural production. Local officials were compelled to comply, and by 1939, more than 90 percent of the peasants lived and worked on state-run farms. Resistance was met with arrest, imprisonment, and forced labor.
This authoritarian control led to catastrophic outcomes like significant loss of livestock and mass famines, as evidenced in Ukraine with the tragic event known as the Holodomor, which resulted in the deaths of millions.
#SPJ11
On June 8, 1925, in the United States, Supreme Court commanded, that the Constitution’s First Amendment attestation of free speech, alleges that Congress required to make legislation for the annulling the prerequisite of interpretation and additionally to state regulations. The judgment was fundamental in which the Court affirmed that the Fourteenth Amendment’s clause of due process necessitated state and federal ordinances to be carried to the equivalent measures in regulating speech.
Further Explanation:
The predicament Gitlow v. New York obtains momentum in November 1919 when Gitlow, and Larkin, enclosed by New York City police officers for forbidden turmoil, militarism under state authority of New York. Larkin and Gitlow who applies to the Communist Party encouraged the persuasive overthrow of the United States presidency. However, Gitlow discussed at hearing that no drastic transition was accelerated by the report, he was convicted, and the execution was consequently established by the State appellate court.
In 1923 the Verbal reasoning before the Supreme Court took place and the court also circulated its verdict, commanded by Justice Edward T. Sanford. The administration supported Gitlow’s conviction, but moderately the judgment prolonged free speech protections for notable since the tribunal believed that the First Amendment was relevant to state representatives performed the due process requirement
Learn more:
1. In the case roe v. wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws? brainly.com/question/10483664
2. In furman v. georgia (1972), william furman appealed his death sentence for? brainly.com/question/2199281
Answer details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: 20th Century
Keywords:
Commanded constitution , amendment, supreme court , Gitlow , condemnation, justice, government, convicted , execution , Stanford , protection.
It is a result of the ongoing impact of the Arab-Israeli War.
Shi’ites and Sunnis have prevented them from establishing a territory of their own.
They are a nomadic people with no desire for a permanent settlement.
The correct option is B.
It is a result of the ongoing impact of the Arab-Israeli War.
Due to the civil war in Syria that commenced in 2011, many Palestinians in Syria have been displaced, either within Syria, itself or have fled the country.
Besides those displaced by war, others have emigrated overseas for various reasons such as work opportunities, education, and religious persecution. In the decade following the 1967 war, for example, an average of 21,000 Palestinians per year were forced out of Israeli-controlled areas.
Learn more about the Arab-Israeli War here brainly.com/question/7070008
#SPJ2
Answer:
It's a result of the impact of the ongoing war with the Isreal
Explanation:
I won't say they are nomadic
b. $640.
c. $560.
d. $550.
The answer is (B) $600
Answer:
At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.
Answer:
At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.
Explanation:
Got it right on the test