Answer:
black
Explanation:
The answer would be C
That is why the Share Our Wealth societies are forming in every nook and corner of America….They have a great work to perform. Here is what we stand for in a nutshell:
Number one, we propose that every family in America should at least own a homestead equal in value to not less than one third the average family wealth…. So our first proposition means that every family will have a home and the comforts of a home up to a value of not less than around $5,000 or a little more than that.
Number two, we propose that no family shall own more than three hundred times the average family wealth, which means that no family shall possess more than a wealth of approximately $5 million….
Number three, we propose that every family shall have an income equal to at least one third of the average family income in America…. We propose that no family will have an earning of less than around $2,000 to $2,500 and that none will have more than three hundred times the average less the ordinary income taxes, which means that a million dollars would be the limit on the highest income.
What is the dominant form of evidence used in this passage?
A) ethical evidence
B) logical evidence
C) emotional evidence
D) there is no type of evidence that is dominant
Answer: Logical evidence
Explanation:
This whole section is very straightforward. There are a lot of statistics, numbers, and facts for the American people.
Thus, it can't be emotional evidence.
To continue, its not discussing ethics (people's behavior). It's just assigning funds to American families.
So, it has to be logical evidence, which makes sense because FDR describes the condition of the US and the moves he has to take to make sure that the country doesn't end up in economic difficulty.
Answer:
Now to cover the principles of the share-our-wealth society, I give them in order:
1. To limit poverty:
We propose that a deserving family shall share in our wealth of America at least for one third the average. An average family is slightly less than five persons. The number has become less during depression. The United States total wealth in normal times is about $400 billion or about $15,000 to a family. If there were fair distribution of our things in America, our national wealth would be three or four or five times the $400 billion, because a free, circulating wealth is worth many times more than wealth congested and frozen into a few hands as is America's wealth. But, figuring only on the basis of wealth as valued when frozen into a few hands, there is the average of $15,000 to the family. We say that we will limit poverty of the deserving people. One third of the average wealth to the family, or $5,000, is a fair limit to the depths we will allow any one man's family to fall. None too poor, none too rich.
–Huey Long,
February 5, 1934
Why does Long believe that distributing about $15,000 to each US family would increase the nation’s wealth to more than $400 billion?
It would create hope for the lower classes and inspire them to work harder.
It would make things more even for all Americans.
It would limit the depths of poverty that anyone can sink into.
It would increase cash circulation in the market because more people would be spending.
Explanation:
what is the answer? pls never mind the answer was d
i drew up a timetable for my exam preparations and revised the lessons every day, knowing that my classmates were
somewhat competitive.
O
I drew up a timetable for my exams beforehand and revised the lessons thoroughly according to the daily schedule,
because I knew that my classmates were sort of competitive.
Drawing up a timetable for my exam preparations beforehand and revising lessons every day was my pathway to success,
as I knew that my classmates were extremely competitive.
O
knowing that my classmates were fairly competitive, I drew up a timetable for my exam preparations beforehand and
revised the lessons according to the daily schedule.
Answer:
The sentence that best adds dramatic tension is Option C: Drawing up a timetable for my exam preparations beforehand and revising lessons every day was my pathway to success, as I knew that my classmates were extremely competitive.
Explanation:
Dramatic tension is an important part of any literature work or a film. It can be defined as excitement or an anticipation of the result of a story, for example, climax of a suspense novel. Dramatic tension can be loud or quite in nature. It may include surprises, mysteries, tasks, uncertainty.
In Option C, the writer mentions the tasks he is performing everyday to succeed in the exam because he knows that his classmates are extremely competitive. They arouse the curiosity of the outcome of the exam. The other options use words like, somewhat competitive, sort of competitive or fairly competitive for the classmates, which do not arouse dramatic tension like in Option C.