The anthropologist C. Scott Littleton defined comparative mythology as "the systematic comparison of myths and mythic themes drawn from a wide variety of cultures".[1] By comparing different cultures' mythologies, scholars try to identify underlying similarities and/or to reconstruct a "protomythology" from which those mythologies developed.[1] To an extent, all theories about mythology follow a comparative approach: as the scholar of religion Robert Segal notes, "by definition, all theorists [of myth] seek similarities among myths".[2] However, scholars of mythology can be roughly divided into particularists, who emphasize the differences between myths, and comparativists, who emphasize the similarities. Particularists tend to "maintain that the similarities deciphered by comparativists are vague and superficial", while comparativists tend to "contend that the differences etched by particularists are trivial and incidental".[3]
Comparative approaches to mythology held great popularity among eighteenth- and nineteenth-century scholars. Many of these scholars believed that all myths showed signs of having evolved from a single myth or mythical theme.[4] For example, the nineteenth-century philologist Friedrich Max Müller led a school of thought which interpreted nearly all myths as poetic descriptions of the sun's behavior. According to this theory, these poetic descriptions had become distorted over time into seemingly diverse stories about gods and heroes.[4] However, modern-day scholars lean more toward particularism, feeling suspicious of broad statements about myths.[5] One exception to this trend is Joseph Campbell's theory of the "monomyth", which is discussed below. Another recent exception is the historical approach followed in E.J. Michael Witzel's reconstruction of many subsequent layers of older mythologies [6] (discussed further below).
Joseph Campbell in his many writings on what should constitute a total science of mythology describes the difference in the two approaches:
"For, as a broad view of the field [of mythology] immediately shows, in every well-established culture realm to which a new system of thought and civilization comes, it is received creatively, not inertly. A sensitive, complex process of selection, adaptation, and development brings the new forms into contact with their approximate analogues or homologues in the native inheritance, and in certain instances - notably in Egypt, Crete, the Indus valley, and a little later, the Far East - prodigious forces of indigenous productivity are released in native style, but on the level of the new stage. In other words, although its culture stage at any given period may be shown to have been derived, as an effect of alien influences, the particular style of each of the great domains can no less surely be shown to be indigenous. And so it is that a scholar largely concerned with native forms will tend to argue for local, stylistic originality, whereas one attentive rather to the broadly flung evidence of diffused techniques, artifacts, and mythological motifs will be inclined to lime out a single culture history of mankind, characterized by well-defined general stages, though rendered by way of no less well-defined local styles. It is one thing to analyze the genesis and subsequent diffusion of the fundamental heritage of all high civilizations whatsoever; another to mark the genesis, maturation, and demise of the several local mythological styles; and a third to measure the force of each local style in the context of the unitary history of mankind. A total science of mythology must give attention, as far as possible, to all three."[7]
Caliban should be more appreciative that Prospero took him under his wing when he arrived on the island.
What do you think? Write a paragraph supporting your opinion and then write a reply paragraph. If you're working with others, your reply paragraph should respond to the ideas of another student. If you're working alone, your reply paragraph should support the opposite point of view from your own.
Appreciation would always be present regardless of the factthat Prospero’s treatment of Caliban changed. Because of Prospero’s initial kindness toward Caliban, an appreciationwas there. Again, even if the treatmentchanged, that appreciation of initial kindness would never be changed toresentment. Further, even if it werepossible for Caliban to be more appreciative, what would really have had tochange were the actions, not the feelings (which is what appreciation is—a feeling). Perhaps if Caliban had done more to show hisappreciation, Prospero’s treatment of Caliban would not have changed toharshness.
Answer:
Caliban should not be more appreciative of Prospero because he took him under his wing when he arrived on the island.
Explanation:
Prospero taught him how to speak and cared for him, and in return, Caliban showed Prospero his island. However, Prospero betrays him by imprisoning Caliban in a tiny cave and taking the island for himself. Prospero also abuses Caliban if he doesn’t do as he is told. “If thou neglect'st or dost unwillingly/What I command, I'll rack thee with old cramps/Fill all thy bones with aches, make thee roar/That beasts shall tremble at thy din." (Act I, Scene II). Although Prospero shows kindness by teaching Caliban his language, his abuse towards Caliban outways any positive notions. It becomes solid reasoning in support of the idea that Caliban should not be more appreciative of Prospero.
Answer:
Friend 1: Hey, you won the competition last weekend, right? How did it go?
Friend 2: Yeah, it was incredible! I couldn't believe it. The competition was tough, but I managed to come out on top.
Friend 1: That's amazing! What was the competition about?
Friend 2: It was a cooking competition, and the theme was to create a unique pasta dish. I had this crazy idea for a fusion recipe, and it worked!
Friend 1: Fusion pasta? That sounds intriguing. What did you come up with?
Friend 2: I made a dish that combined Italian pasta with some Thai flavors. It had this fantastic balance of sweet and spicy, and the judges loved it.
Friend 1: No wonder you won! How did you feel when they announced the winner?
Friend 2: Oh, I was nervous until the very end. But when they called my name, I was over the moon! It was such a great feeling.
Friend 1: I can only imagine! Winning a competition must be a fantastic experience.
Friend 2: It truly was. It's not just about the victory but also the journey and the thrill of competing. You should give it a try sometime.
Friend 1: I might, especially after hearing your exciting story. Congratulations again, and I'm glad you had such a great experience.
Love waves
Light waves
Lemon waves
it is B: Love waves.
b. False