Answer:
y=-2x-13
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not sure if these what they want.
y-b=m(x-a)
y-3=-2(x--8)
y-3=-2x-16
add 3 to each side
y=-2x-13
____
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum can be found by adding the parts:
__
The sum of numbers 1 to n is n(n+1)/2.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Previous concepts
Beta distribution is defined as "a continuous density function defined on the interval [0, 1] and present two parameters positive, denoted by α and β, both parameters control the shape. "
The probability function for the beta distribution is given by:
Where B represent the beta function defined as:
Solution to the problem
For our case our random variable is given by:
We can use the following R code to plot the distribution for this case:
> x=seq(0,1,0.01)
> plot(x,dbeta(x,5,2),main = "Beta distribution a=5, b=2",ylab = "Probability")
And we got as the result the figure attached.
And for this case we want this probability, since we want the probability that she has at most 10% or 0.1 change of winning:
And we can find this probability with the following R code:
> pbeta(0.1,5,2)
[1] 5.5e-05
And we got then this :
yo is
x is
Q is
q is
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
b) Does it make sense to ask if the difference is statisically significante? Can you answer on the basis of the informations given?
c) Repeat b), assuming the percentages are based on independant simple random samples of 1,000 first year college students drawn each year.
Answer:
a. The difference is important but the question does not make sense
b. Yes, it makes sense to ask if the difference is statistically significant.
c. Please check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question, we identify the following relation;
: = 0
: ≠ 0
a) The difference is important as asked, but the cultural atmosphere difference of over 30 years makes the question somehow not making sense
b) Yes, it makes sense. In order to answer, it is necessary to know the sample size of the year 2000 survey.
We can answer the question on the basis of the information given.
c) We proceed here as follows;
α = 0.05 , = 1.96 ( This is the critical value)
Thus, z = (0.74-0.36)/√(0.36-0.64)/1000 = 25.03
We make the following conclusions; Since 25.03 > 1.96, the null hypothesis is rejected which means that the proportion of people who think being well officially is important has changed since 1970.