=======================================================
Explanation:
We have two workers, more or less. Worker A gets the job done in 5 hours. Worker B comes along to help. If A and B work together, they get the job done in 4 hours. This assumes neither worker hinders the other.
Worker A's rate is 1/5 of a job per hour. In other words, after 1 hour, 1/5 of the job is done.
The combined rate is 1/4 for similar reasoning
Worker B's rate is 1/x where x represents how long it takes worker B to get the job done on its own.
The equation to solve is
1/5 + 1/x = 1/4
Note how 1/5 and 1/x represents the sum of the individual rates to get the combined rate 1/4
To solve this equation, it helps to clear out the fractions. Multiply every term by the LCD 20x
20x(1/5 + 1/x) = 20x(1/4)
20x(1/5) + 20x(1/x) = 20x(1/4)
4x + 20 = 5x
From here you can probably see solving this is relatively easy
4x+20 = 5x
20 = 5x-4x
20 = x
x = 20
Therefore, it will take 20 hours for worker B to get the job done on its own.
Going back to the processing context, it takes 20 hours for the new processor to download the movie. This is where the new processor is working alone without help from the original processor.
----------------
Side note: downloading a movie really depends on internet speed rather than processor speed.
children and how many adults were admitted?
Your answer is
number of children equals____
number of adults equals____
0.42 + (3.5 × 10-2)
Answer: 33.42
Step-by-step explanation: 0.42 + (35 - 2) —> 0.42 + 33 = 33.42
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
50
2x – 10y = 4
Question 18 options:
A)
(3,1)
B)
(2,0)
C)
(4,–5)
D)
(–3,4)
Answer:
opt B (2,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
.
.
.
pls rate
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
pls show work/explanation!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation of a line
To define the equation of a line, we only need two points through which it passes. The graph shows two clear points to choose: (0,2) and (1,-1)
Set up the equation of the line by using the formula
Operating
Rearranging
Probability of not witnessing a major tornado hit over the next ten years would be derived from historical data based on frequency of such events. Probability is a measure of uncertainty and these estimates can change as more information becomes available. Actual probability calculations can involve complex concepts such as Poisson distributions and conditional probabilities.
The question asks for the probability of not witnessing a major tornado hit over the next ten years. Probability in this context would typically be derived from historical data on frequency of such events. The data provided seems unrelated, so I'll provide a hypothetical example instead. If historical data shows that the state gets hit by a major tornado every 20 years on average, you could argue there's a 50% chance (1 out of 2 decades) that the state will not be hit by a major tornado in the next ten years.
However, keep in mind that probability is a measure of uncertainty, not certainty. Probabilities are estimates based on what we currently know and can change as more information becomes available. For example, if climate change leads to more severe weather events, the chance of a tornado might increase.
This is a simplified model and actual probability calculations can be much more complex, involving things like Poisson distributions and conditional probabilities which are often used in analyses of rare events such as natural disasters.
#SPJ12