True
B.
False
Answer:
true :) hope this helps
Explanation:
The personal experience with slavery would allow for true stories of the experience rather than philosophical or moral arguments.
People would be more likely to believe a person’s first-hand accounts of abuses.
A former slave taking up such a cause could prove to people that free slaves could be capable citizens.
A former slave could make a more persuasive messenger for abolition than a person who was never enslaved by appealing to the audience's emotions, to a former slave it would be easier to awake the empaty of the audience because he will transmit the accurate feelings that would appeal to the audience's fears, desires, etc.
Another way to make a former slave a more persuasive messenger for abolition is to present the evidence that demonstrates he was a slave and to use his anecdotes to convey a touching message.
Answer:
Toussaint-Louverture
Explanation:
It's actually Manufacturing in the Northeast. In the late 1800s, sure there was the use of steam boats and stuff like that, but manufacturing took over and had much more demand for coal and other fossil fuels. Also, I took the test and New Ships using steam power was wrong. Manufacturing in the Northeast is correct!