Sam Houston considered asking Great Britain for help if the United States refused.
Texas had been a part of Mexico since Mexico won its independence from Spain in 1821. But there was plenty of tension between the Mexican government and the territory of Texas. Texas declared its independence from Mexico in 1836, and under the leadership of Sam Houston, defeated the Mexican army at the Battle of San Jacinto in April of that year. However, the Mexican government continued to refuse official recognition of Texas' independence.
When the Republic of Texas was established in 1836, the citizens of the newly independent country voted for Sam Houston as their president ... but also voted their endorsement of Texas becoming part of the United States. There was plenty of delay before that happened, however, because there was question and controversy over whether or not Texas would enter the Union as a slave state.
In the process of those long negotiations, the government of Texas had also looked to Great Britain for possible support in its ongoing tensions with Mexico. In 1843, Sam Houston's administration in Texas was considering making a deal with the Mexican government that would allow Texas to govern itself but with some connection to Mexico. They would have asked Great Britain to act as mediator in negotiating with Mexico.
Ultimately, however, the United States Congress did finally vote for acceptance of Texas as a state in 1844. In 1845, Texas entered the US as the 28th state ... and permitted as a slave state.
Answer:
I am pretty sure it is the Salam witch trials
B. It implemented desegregation legislation.
C. It redefined the concepts of “separate but equal.”
D. It discouraged people from continued protests.
C. The ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson affect the legalities of segregation by redefining the “separate but equal” doctrine as a legal precedent.
Further Explanation:
The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson took place in the aftermath of an incident that took place in year 1892, when Homer Plessy, an African American passenger, was arrested as he refused to move from the paid first-class car because he was man of color. He was charged for violating the Separate Car Act of 1890. His attorneys entered a plea based on the equal protection of the laws that was guaranteed to them by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court had passed a ruling that rejected this argument of violation of constitutional rights.
The Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896 upheld the issue of racial segregation. It was sanctioned as per the “separate but equal” doctrine,and on the constitutional grounds ruled that any state law was not in conflict with the 13th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution.
The ruling had some major implications at the society level mainly concerning the education of colored people which was deemed necessary for their emancipation. The most important was regarding the funding of educational institutions or segregated schools. The segregated schools had to bear the brunt of racial discrimination in terms of under funding and inferior educational supplies and buildings.
Learn more:
1. A provision of the us neutrality act of 1935 brainly.com/question/2412497
2. The part of the us government that interprets laws is the... brainly.com/question/889076
Answer Details:
Grade: College History
Subject: History
Chapter: The Supreme Court and Civil Rights
Keywords: Plessy v. Ferguson, separate but equal, legal precedent, Supreme Court, 1892, Homer Plessy, African American, Separate Car Act of 1890, Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Constitution, Constitutional rights, 1896, Racial segregation, 13th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution, Education, Funding, Segregated schools .
The ruling in Plessy C. Ferguson affects the legalities of segregation because:
(C) It redefined the concepts of separate but equal.
This case occurred in the state of Virginia, a former Confederate state in the southern United States. The local law was segregationist. For example, the railway company had to create wagons for blacks and whites separately. Homer Plessy, an Afro-American man who was not allowed to sit in the white wagon, decided to break the law. He was arrested and sent to the Supreme Court of the United States.
This court confirmed the judgment of the court of Louisiana and rejected his claim. The judges said that segregation was not a violation of the 13th amendment that abolished slavery. This judgment more recognized the right of states to apply racist and segregationist laws, as long as each racial group was treated equally with each similar group. There was not a law for all, but a law for each population group. All whites must be equal for the same laws, and all blacks must be equal before the same laws. It was called the concept of separate but equal.
Subject: History
Chapter: The Reconstruction Era
Keywords: slavery, segregation, the black people in the United States, southern states, civil rights, separate but equal concept
Answer:
The United States decided to stay neutral in the 1920’s and 1930’s.
The reason for the United States decision was because they wanted to stay
as an isolationist country. The United States did not want to be a part of other
nations affairs. Instead they wanted to focus on their own problems. They
also did not want to be a part of the war. In the beginning the ideas about
neutrality started to change when President Roosevelt wanted to support
China. He did not want to follow the Neutrality Acts. The President decided to
use the Cash-and-Carry system. He believed that helping democratic
governments was way more important than keeping the U.S neutral. We start
to see the ideas about neutrality alter when Roosevelt signed the Lend-Lease
Act. This authorized Roosevelt to sell arms or protective aid to other nations
without them having to pay in cash.
Explanation:
government because each provides for
(1) a standing army
(2) elected representatives
(3) control over the money supply
(4) a system of implied powers