0.09502 to 2 decimal places
0.09502 to 2 decimal places - 1

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: 0.09502 to 2 decimal places

any number which is 5 or greater rounds to the next number

0.1 will be our answer

Related Questions

2) The Rodriguez family went to dinner at Pasta Palace. Mr. Rodriguez ordered ameal for $16.25; Mrs. Rodriguez ordered a meal for $19.50; the three childrenordered individual pizzas for $6.99 each. The tax rate is 8.75% and the familywants to leave an 18% tip applied after the tax. How do they leave in allincluding tax and tip? Helpppp pleaseee!!! I will give brainlest!!!! With explanation
There are 6 rotten mangoes and 24 good mangoes in a bag. What fraction of the mangoes is rotten?
Find the radical equivalent of 272/3 and compute it?
Solve the inequality 2w-3>14
If y varies directly with x. If x = 2, then y = 24. What is the value of x when y = 96? x =

If x-3 is 4 more than w, then x is how much more than w?

Answers

Well, what I do is actually substitute in numbers. So what I did was x= 3 and made then did the subtraction. Afterwards I got x = 0. Since x= w+4 you would want to subtract four to get the distance. Afterwards you get 3 (x) is ? than w= - 4 and thats 7 (7 is the answer)

Answer:

definitely 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Identify the asymptotes.
y=1/x-6

Answers

Horizontal asymptote
y=1x−6

limx→∞
=1/x−6

=(1/x) / [(x/x)−6/x]

 

=0 / 1

= 0

The function is also undefined at x=6. So there is a vertical asymptote at x=6.

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!

If the midpoint between (x, 3) and (9, 9) is (7, 6), find the value of x.

Answers

The midpoint formula states that the midpoint is equal to (x1 + x2/2, y1 + y2/2). However, in this instance, we only have to deal with the x-values because that is where our unknown variable x is. Using our formula for the x-values, we can set up the following equation:

(x + 9)/2 = 7

To solve this equation, we must first multiply both sides by 2 to get rid of the denominator on the left side of the equation.

x + 9 = 14

Next, we should subtract 9 from both sides of the equation to get the variable x alone on the left side.

x = 5

Therefore, your answer is x=5.

Hope this helps!

What expression is equivalent to -5x^(2)-10x

Answers

Good morning ☕️

Answer:

-5x(x + 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

the key is factoring:

-5x² - 10x = -5x × (x) - 5x × (2)  {here we notice that -5x is a common factor}

               = -5x(x + 2)

_________________________________

:)

Answer:

- 5 {x}^(2)  - 10x \n   = - 5 x(x + 2)

hope this helps you

Can someone tell me why the answer is 2? _____
√−3x+10=x

x=2 and x=−5
x=2
x=5
No solution

Answers

Answer:

If we put x=2 in the given equation, we get the answer for the equation as 2

Given:

      √(-3 x+10)=x

To find:

Why the answer is 2

Solution:

If we substitute the value x=2 in the given option, we get

        √(-3(2)+10)=2

          √(-6+10)=2

        √(4)=2

Result:

Thus we can say that when substitute the value of x=2

We get the answer as √(-3 x+10)=2

Sales at a fast-food restaurant average $6,000 per day. The restaurant decided to introduce an advertising campaign to increase daily sales. To determine the effectiveness of the advertising campaign, a sample of 49 days of sales were taken. They found that the average daily sales were $6,300 per day. From past history, the restaurant knew that its population standard deviation is about $1,000. If the level of significance is 0.01, have sales increased as a result of the advertising campaign? Multiple Choice A. Reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean is equal to $6,000 per day.
B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
C. Reject the null hypothesis and conclude the mean is lower than $6,000 per day.
D. Reject the null hypothesis and conclude the mean is higher than $6,000 per day.

Answers

Answer:

Option B) Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

Population mean, μ = $6,000

Sample mean, \bar{x} = $6,300

Sample size, n = 49

Alpha, α = 0.01

Population standard deviation, σ = $1,000

First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis

H_(0): \mu = 6000\text{ dollars per week}\nH_A: \mu > 6000\text{ dollars per week}

We use one-tailed(right) z test to perform this hypothesis.

Formula:

z_(stat) = \displaystyle\frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{(\sigma)/(√(n)) }

Putting all the values, we have

z_(stat) = \displaystyle(6300 - 6000)/((1000)/(√(49)) ) = 2.1

Now, z_(critical) \text{ at 0.01 level of significance } = 2.33

Since,  

z_(stat) < z_(critical)

We fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis. Thus, we conclude that sales have not increased as a result of the advertising campaign

Option B) Fail to reject the null hypothesis.