A RUN-ON SENTENCE (sometimes called a "fused sentence") has at least two parts, either one of which can stand by itself (in other words, two independent clauses), but the two parts have been smooshed together instead of being properly connected. Review, also, the section which describes Things That Can Happen Between Two Independent Clauses.
Here is an example "I love to write papers I would write one every day if I had the time!" The run on sentence would be... "I love to write papers. I would write one every day if I had the time!"
Hope this helps!!
A photograph of a Civil War era cemetery would be the best example of media to set the mood for a speaker giving a speech about a Civil War battle. Option D would help the audience visualize the human cost and tragedy of the conflict. It would evoke emotions and help the audience empathize with the soldiers and their families.
A diagram of a Civil War era gun or a map of the battle's location may be useful for providing context and understanding the tactics used, but they may not set the appropriate mood or emotional tone for the speech. A graph of battles won and lost by the Union may be informative, but it may not necessarily evoke the emotional response that a photograph of a cemetery would.
Therefore, option D, a photograph of a Civil War era cemetery, would be the best choice to set the mood for a speaker giving a speech about a Civil War battle.
Learn more about civil war, here:
#SPJ1
B.) Traditional energy sources generate more power than wind turbines.
C.) Wind power is the most unreliable renewable energy resource.
D.)Wind power is the most economical renewable energy resource.
Paragraph 5: Economic Benefits of Wind Energy
Wind energy is the lowest-priced renewable energy technology we have. It can cost between 4 and 6 cents per kilowatt-hour. At first glance, it can be argued that energy from traditional power sources such as gas can cost between 3.9 and 4.4 cents per kilowatt-hour. However, gas prices can rise and burning fuel releases pollutants and greenhouse gases into the air. Coal costs between 4.8 and 5.5 cents per kilowatt-hour. Because burning coal pollutes the air and coal mining destroys forests and soil quality, coal plants must meet strict environmental regulations. This makes it difficult and costly to build new coal plants. According to Synapse Energy Economics’ most recent report, if the use of wind energy was doubled in the mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes states, consumers could save $6.9 billion a year.
How well does the author address the counterclaims in paragraph 5 that fossil fuels are less expensive than wind power?
A.) The response is effective because the author lists added financial and environmental costs of using fossil fuels that raise the cost higher than what is stated.
B.) The response is effective because the author calls into question the reliability of the source information stated in the counterclaims.
C.) The response is ineffective because the statistics clearly show that energy from fossil fuels costs less than energy from wind power.
D.) The response is ineffective because the author chooses to ignore the information presented in the counterclaims.
Answer:
Question 1: D.)Wind power is the most economical renewable energy resource
Question 2: A.) The response is effective because the author lists added financial and environmental costs of using fossil fuels that raise the cost higher than what is stated.
Explanation:
Question 1: Which statement most accurately states a claim developed in paragraph 5?
A.) Traditional energy sources are safer for the planet than wind turbines.
Traditional energy sources are suggested to be a source of pollutants and greenhouse gases, making them a less safe option compared to renewable sources
B.) Traditional energy sources generate more power than wind turbines.
This is not mentioned in the paragraph
C.) Wind power is the most unreliable renewable energy resource.
This is not mentioned in the paragraph
D.)Wind power is the most economical renewable energy resource.
This is mentioned in the first line of the paragraph where it is stated that "wind energy is the lowest-prices renewable energy technology we have"
Question 2: How well does the author address the counterclaims in paragraph 5 that fossil fuels are less expensive than wind power?
A.) The response is effective because the author lists added financial and environmental costs of using fossil fuels that raise the cost higher than what is stated.
The additional financial (rising fuel prices) and environmental costs (pollutants, impacts of mining) are detailed to suggest non-quantified costs of traditional energy sources
B.) The response is effective because the author calls into question the reliability of the source information stated in the counterclaims.
The reliability of the source is not questioned, rather additional information is provided
C.) The response is ineffective because the statistics clearly show that energy from fossil fuels costs less than energy from wind power.
The statistics mentioned show that current prices of gas and coal (which may increase) result in energy costs comparable to energy generated from wind
D.) The response is ineffective because the author chooses to ignore the information presented in the counterclaims.
The information in the counterclaims is not ignored, alternate information is presented to show a different side
What is the sentence?
compelling could mean any of the following:
evoking interest/attention
not able to resist
or, not able to be refuted
A pro of keeping fit is that you will be healthier, this is because you are exercising and moving which is good for your body. Another pro of keeping fit is that you will feel better and will most likely feel more energetic. However, a con of keeping fit is that it requires time. Another con is that it might be hard at first because your body is not used to it. My opinion on this is that it that once you overcome the cons, the pros will be much better, and that it is good to keep fit.