Answer: 12 cups of salad blend are in the resulting mixture
Explanation:
Since we have given that
4 cups of a salad blend contains 40% spinach
Using mixture allegation method, we get that
8 cups of a salad blend contains 55% spinach as shown in the figure below.
Now, we need to find the number of cups of salad in the resulting mixture,
Hence, 12 cups of salad blend are in the resulting mixture .
Answer:
Option C: 12 cups of salad
Let the unknown cups of salad in the mixture be x( unknown cup in 55% mixture)
Thus, we have the following expression that shows the number of salad in the resulting mixture;
4(40%) + x(55%) = (4+x)(50%)
= 0.4(4) + x(0.55) = 0.5(4 + x)
= 1.6 + 0.55x = 0.2 + 0.5x
0.2 -1.6 = 0.55x-0.5x
0.4 = 0.05x
x = 0.4/0.05
x = 8 cups of salad
So the number of salad cups in the resulting mixture = x + 4 = 8 + 4 = 12 cups of salad
Answer:
175 hot dogs
Step-by-step explanation:
The new price will be $3.85 + 0.55 = $4.40. Since the price has increased by a factor of 4.40/3.85 = 8/7, the number of hot dogs sold, which is inversely proportional, will be ...
(7/8)·200 = 175 . . . hot dogs sold at the higher price
The vendor can expect to sell approximately 233 hot dogs if the price is increased by 55 cents.
To determine how many hot dogs the vendor can expect to sell if the price is increased by 55 cents, we can use the inverse proportionality relationship between the number of hot dogs sold and the price charged.
First, let's set up a proportion with the initial price and number of hot dogs sold:
$3.85 / 200 = (new price + $0.55) / x
Next, we can cross multiply and solve for x:
x = (200 * ($3.85 + $0.55)) / $3.85
Calculating this expression gives us a value of x ≈ 233.77.
Since the number of hot dogs sold must be a whole number, we round down to the nearest whole number, giving us an estimated value of 233 hot dogs.
#SPJ12
Answer:
374.4
Step-by-step explanation:
All items related to the maintenance are 20% more expensive, it means that each datum is 20% bigger including the average.
The variance its a dispersion measurof the data and its calculated of this way:
Here n is the number of data, is the average and
represent each datum. The increment in 20% in each parameter can be represented multiplying for 1.2, of this way
Factorizing the 1.2 we have:
That is:
The new variance is
To calculate the variance of the annual cost of maintaining and repairing a car after the tax is introduced, we can use the formula var(X + c) = var(X), where X is the original cost and c is the tax rate. In this case, the tax rate is 20%, so c = 0.2. The variance of the original cost is 260, so the variance of the cost after the tax is introduced is also 260.
To calculate the variance of the annual cost of maintaining and repairing a car after the tax is introduced, we can use the formula var(X + c) = var(X), where X is the original cost and c is the tax rate. In this case, the tax rate is 20%, so c = 0.2. The variance of the original cost is 260, so the variance of the cost after the tax is introduced is also 260.
#SPJ12
Answer: associative
Step-by-step explanation:
the associative property is used to state that numbers in an addition expression can be grouped differently still giving the same sum
the two weeks?
(Points : 1)
Answer:
The median is 0.93
cos2x-sin2x=1-2sin2x