Answer:
Answer:
16+x
Step-by-step explanation:
f. Would you still use the same domain and range? Why or why not?
Answer:
a) The domain of the function is . , , b)The range of the function is . , , c) The ball is 73 meters off of the ground at x = 3 seconds.Step-by-step explanation:The complete statement is: A ball is thrown upward off of a 100 meter cliff with an initial velocity of 6 m/s. The function represents this situation where x is time and y is the distance off of the ground. a) What domain does the function make sense? b) What range does the function make sense ? c) How far off the ground is the ball at time x = 3 seconds?a) Let and be the time, measured in seconds, and the distance of the ground, measured in meters, respectively. Time is a positive variable, so domain corresponds to the interval when and . That is: Therefore, the domain of the function is . , b) The distance off of the ground is also a positive variable, where ball is thrown upward at a height of 100 meters and hits the ground at a height of 0 meters. Hence, the range of the function is . , c) The distance of the ball off of the ground at x = 3 seconds is found by evaluating the function:The ball is 73 meters off of the ground at x = 3 seconds.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: It is only the 3rd equation that is a good example to Jeremy's argument. Others are counter examples to Jeremy's argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us consider the general linear equation
Y = MX + C
On a coordinate plane, a line goes through points (0, negative 1) and (2, 0).
Slope = ( 0 - -1)/( 2- 0) = 1/2
When x = 0, Y = -1
Substitutes both into general linear equation
-1 = 1/2(0) + C
C = -1
The equations for the coordinate is therefore
Y = 1/2X - 1
Let's check the equations one after the other
y = negative one-half x minus 1
Y = -1/2X - 1
y = negative one-half x + 1
Y = -1/2X + 1
y = one-half x minus 1
Y = 1/2X - 1
y = one-half x + 1
Y = 1/2X + 1
It is only the 3rd equation that is a good example to Jeremy's argument. Others are counter examples to Jeremy's argument.
Jeremy's claim that if a linear function has the same steepness (slope) and the same y-intercept, it must be the same function is not correct. A counterexample is y = negative one-half x + 1, which has the same steepness and y-intercept but is a different function.
The line going through points (0, negative 1) and (2, 0) can be expressed in slope-intercept form (y = mx + b) where the slope m can be calculated as (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) and the y-intercept b is the y-value when x=0. For this line, we have m = (0 - (-1))/(2-0) = 1/2 and b = -1. Hence, the equation for this line is y = one-half x - 1.
However, we can prove Jeremy's claim wrong with a counterexample. Even if a function has the same slope and y-intercept, it doesn't necessarily mean they represent the same function. A counterexample is y = negative one-half x + 1. This line has the same steepness (slope -1/2) but a different direction (its slope is negative, unlike the other line), and the same y-intercept (y=1 when x=0) but it's not the same function.
#SPJ3
Mark needs 36 inches of ribbon to go around the sides of the picture frame.
A rectangle is a 2-D shape with length and width.
The length and width are different.
If the length and width are not different then it is a square.
The area of a rectangle is given as:
Area = Length x width
We have,
The length of ribbon required to go around the picture frame is equal to the perimeter of the frame.
The perimeter of a rectangle is given by the formula:
= 2 (length + width)
= 2 (11 + 7)
= 2(18)
= 36 inches
Therefore,
Mark needs 36 inches of ribbon to go around the sides of the picture frame.
Learn more about rectangles here:
#SPJ2
g(x) = 5x + 3
The options are
A)Adding 3 to the function translates the parent graph 3 units up.
B)Adding 3 to the function translates the parent graph 3 units down.
C)Adding 3 to the function translates the parent graph 3 units to the left.
D)Adding 3 to the function translates the parent graph 3 units to the right.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two functions f(x) = 5x and g(x) = 5x + 3
This parent function f(x) has been translated to form a new function g(x) = 5x + 3
These linear functions can be represented by two lines y = 5x and y' = 5x' + 3
So when we shift line y = 5x by 3 units up on the y-axis then a new graph of
y = 5x + 3 will be formed.
Therefore, Option A is the answer.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
we have g(x) = 5x+3
we know that 5x=f(x)
so g(x)=f(x)+3
thus g(x) is obtained by adding 3 units to f(x)
that's means the graph of g is obtained by translating the parent function f by 3 units up