another mean ing is breaking glassor nosiy
This question is about Ronald Reagan's speech, entitled "A Time for Choosing".
As you did not provide the lines to which this question refers, my answer may be a little inaccurate, because the numbering of lines I have from this course may be different from the numbering of lines to which your question refers.
However, the premise in the paragraph that begins on line 39 according to my text is that the loss of freedom is not beneficial to anyone and that it causes pain and suffering to anyone.
Explanation:
On line 39 Reagan talks about the experience that a friend of his, a Cuban refugee, had to face because of the country's lack of freedom. he had to flee from Cuba, even though he was a successful businessman. Some people reported that he was lucky to be able to leave the country and he even agrees, because he had this option, although many of his fellow citizens do not.
Reagan uses this story to show how the lack of freedom is harmful to anyone, regardless of their social position or their ability to escape. The lack of freedom is harmful for that reason, it cannot be allowed in America.
For more information for line 39, please refer the below link :
This question is about Ronald Reagan's speech, entitled "A Time for Choosing".
Answer:
As you did not provide the lines to which this question refers, my answer may be a little inaccurate, because the numbering of lines I have from this course may be different from the numbering of lines to which your question refers.
However, the premise in the paragraph that begins on line 39 according to my text is that the loss of freedom is not beneficial to anyone and that it causes pain and suffering to anyone.
Explanation:
On line 39 Reagan talks about the experience that a friend of his, a Cuban refugee, had to face because of the country's lack of freedom. he had to flee from Cuba, even though he was a successful businessman. Some people reported that he was lucky to be able to leave the country and he even agrees, because he had this option, although many of his fellow citizens do not.
Reagan uses this story to show how the lack of freedom is harmful to anyone, regardless of their social position or their ability to escape. The lack of freedom is harmful for that reason, it cannot be allowed in America.
Answer:
irony punctuation
Explanation:
yeah, it's litterally called that
Answer:
Well, although the most prevalent example right now is of course the coronavirus pandemic, events like this have happened all throughout history. Think of the Black Death: it swept through Europe, killing tens of thousands and pretty much ending the system of feudalism. Though in modern times these pandemics have less potential to upend systems, they remain game changers. The H1N1 epidemic - the Spanish flu - sent shockwaves throughout the globe because of its scope and lethality.
Remember, you are only doing one section. Pick a chapter and go to town!
Option 2: Write an analysis of how the filmmakers of one of the adaptations chose to recreate the movie. Pick a scene — for example, the desperate search for water — and describe and explain how the filmmakers adapted the novel. What parts did they keep? What parts did they change? Why do you think they did that? Do you agree with those decisions? Do you think they made for a better movie? Why or why not?
Write these answers up in a 2 paragraph essay and submit it to your instructor.
Answer:
For Option 1, start by selecting a chapter from the book that you want to adapt into a screenplay or script. Then, read through the chapter carefully, taking note of the characters, their actions, and the setting. Use this information to write out the scene in script format. Make sure to include dialogue, stage directions, and any other relevant details. If you need help with formatting, search online for sample scripts or screenplays.
For Option 2, choose one of the film adaptations of Journey to the Center of the Earth and pick a specific scene to analyze. Watch the scene carefully and take note of how the filmmakers adapted the novel. Look for similarities and differences between the book and the movie, and consider why the filmmakers made those choices. Do you agree with their decisions? Did the changes make for a better movie or detract from the story? Make sure to support your analysis with evidence from both the book and the movie.
Explanation:
New sources of sweetness use better techniques than the old sources did.
Chemists conduct work that is not interesting to much of the public.
Sugar cane is no longer the main source of sweetness for most people.
Answer: Sugar cane is longer the main source of sweetness for most people
Explanation:
According to the passage, people crave sweetness, now more than ever since there are several ways to satisfy that need.
The people now satisfy their urge for sugar by eating sugary snacks and drinking sodas rather than taking sugar cane which was the main source of sweetness for most people before.
Therefore, the objective summary of the passage is that sugar cane is no longer the main source of sweetness for most people.
Sugar cane is no longer the main source of sweetness for most people: this is the most objective summary of the passage. Thus, option D is the correct option.
The passage conveys a factual shift away from sugar cane as the primary sweetener for a majority of individuals. This summary precisely captures the objective essence of the passage's message, highlighting the change in sweetness source without introducing personal opinions or interpretations.
The statement underscores a significant transformation in dietary habits and sources of sweetness, providing an impartial and concise representation of the original passage. It refrains from adding extraneous details, focusing solely on the information presented in the passage.
Thus, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about summary here:
#SPJ3
Probably the full passage is:
We all crave sweetness, now more than ever since there are so many ways to satisfy that need. And there are still sugar plantations where the work is brutal. In places like the Dominican Republic (Haiti's island neighbor), some sugar work is not very different from what it was for Marina's Indian ancestors in British Guiana: hard, poorly paid labor by people who are often mistreated. But for most of us, chemists have more to say about how we satisfy that taste than do overseers. When sugar is in the headlines, critics speak about how much of it we eat, not who picked the crop. Doctors warn that young people are gaining too much weight from eating sugary snacks; parents learn that kids who drink too many sweet sodas can cycle between manic sugar "highs" and grinding sugar "crashes." No one worries about where the sweetness comes from. Our diet was transformed by the Age of Sugar, but that era is over.
Answer:
1. Simple
2. Complex
3. Compound
4. Complex
Explanation:
I’m doing it on edge right now hope this helps :)