The freedom of several Japanese Americans was violated as a result of which act of government?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The freedom of several Japanese Americans was violated as a result of "Executive Order 9066" since this allowed thousands of Japanese Americans to be placed in interment camps. 

Related Questions

Which phrases describe the life of a slave in colonial times?Select all answers that are correct.A. worked to save money for the futureB. seen as someone's property like a horse or cowC. paid with a share of the cropD. lived in a cabin near tobacco or rice fields
Several reference to munich are made in the movie, what event are they referring to (you have to figure this out own your own)
The Holy Roman Empire was created byA. Justinian. B. Julius Caesar. C. Charlemagne. D. Francis II.
Which of these contributes to a budget deficit? Buying bonds and decreasing spending on federal programs Decreasing taxes and increasing spending on federal programs Increasing taxes and buying bonds Decreasing spending on federal programs and increasing taxes
Most workers for the Union Pacific Railroad were Irish French German Chinese

John Foster Dulles is most closely associated with the?:a. policy of mutually assured destruction.
b. flexible response policy.
c. Strategic Defense initiative.
d. zero option policy. E. policy of massive retaliation.

Answers

John Foster Dulles is closely associated with the policy of mutually assured destruction. The correct option among all the options given in the question is option "a". It is actually a national security policy involving the military doctrine of full scale use of nuclear weapons by the attacker as well as the defender, resulting in mutual destruction.

Correct answer:  E. policy of massive retaliation

Answer A is similar, but is incorrect, because at the time Dulles was proposing a policy of massive retaliation, the nuclear arms race had not yet escalated to the point of "mutually assured destruction."  The term "mutually assured destruction" (MAD) was not coined until 1962, by Donald Brennan, an analyst at the Hudson Institute.

Context/detail:

John Foster Dulles was Secretary of State under President Eisenhower.  He held the office from 1953 to 1959.  He wanted a change from what had been the "containment policy" which the US had followed during the Truman Administration, as recommended then by American diplomat George F. Kennan.   Dulles felt the containment approach put the United States in a weak position, because it only was reactive, trying to contain  communist aggression when it occurred.

Dulles sought to push America's policy in a more active direction; some have labeled his approach "brinksmanship."  In an article in LIFE magazine in 1956, Dulles said, "The ability to get to the verge without getting into the war is the necessary art."  He wasn't afraid to threaten massive retaliation against communist enemy countries as a way of intimidating them.

The city of Philadelphia was founded a part of the colony

Answers

The city of Philadelphia was founded as a part of the colony known as "Pennsylvania", which was founded by Mr. Penn with the intention of being a place for religious freedom. 

Congress makes which type of lawA) common law

B) constitutional law

C) military law

D) statutory law

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

b) constitutional law

Explaining the pro-slavery and abolitionist arguments of the antebellum period.

Answers

During the antebellum period in the United States, there were significant debates and arguments surrounding the institution of slavery. Two major perspectives emerged: pro-slavery arguments in support of slavery and abolitionist arguments opposing it.

Pro-Slavery Arguments:

1. Economic Necessity: Proponents of slavery argued that the Southern economy was heavily dependent on agriculture, particularly large-scale cotton cultivation. They believed that slave labor was essential for the profitability of these plantations and that without it, the South's economy would suffer.

2. Racial Superiority: Many pro-slavery advocates promoted the idea of racial superiority, arguing that African Americans were inherently inferior to whites. They used pseudoscience and biased interpretations of religious texts to justify the enslavement of African Americans as a way to "civilize" them.

3. Social Order: Some argued that slavery was necessary to maintain social order in the South. They believed that without slavery, there would be chaos and upheaval as freed slaves could pose a threat to white society.

4. Property Rights: Pro-slavery advocates viewed enslaved people as property, and they argued that property rights were sacrosanct. They believed that the government should protect the rights of slaveowners to their "property."

Abolitionist Arguments:

1. Morality and Human Rights: Abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong and a violation of basic human rights. They believed that every individual had the inherent right to freedom and that enslaving other human beings was a grave injustice.

2. Religious and Ethical Appeals: Many abolitionists cited religious and ethical principles in their arguments against slavery. They contended that slavery went against Christian values of equality and compassion and that it was incompatible with a just society.

3. Economic Critique: Some abolitionists argued that slavery was economically inefficient and that free labor would be more productive in the long run. They believed that the South's reliance on slavery hindered economic development.

4. Political and Legal Arguments: Abolitionists worked to change laws and policies to end slavery. They argued for legislative action to prohibit the expansion of slavery into new territories and states, which eventually led to the Civil War.

It's important to note that these arguments were part of a complex and deeply divisive national debate that ultimately culminated in the American Civil War. Abolitionist sentiments grew stronger over time, leading to the eventual emancipation of enslaved people and the end of slavery in the United States with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1865.

Final answer:

In the antebellum period, the pro-slavery argument suggested that slavery was economically beneficial and culturally justified, while the abolitionist argument maintained that slavery was morally wrong and inhumane. Abolitionists often referenced American democratic principles to insist that all individuals should be equal, irrespective of race.

Explanation:

The antebellum period was a time of intense debate over slavery in the United States. On one side, the pro-slavery arguments asserted that slavery was economically beneficial, a social good, and even justified by religion. It was presumed as necessary for the Southern agricultural economy, especially for labour-intensive crops such as tobacco and cotton.

On the contrary, the abolitionist arguments promoted the view that slavery was morally wrong and inhumane. Abolitionists often pointed to the Declaration of Independence's statement, 'all men are created equal', and insisted that these principles should apply to all individuals, regardless of race. Many abolitionists, like Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth, were former slaves who spoke out about the brutal realities of slavery.

Learn more about antebellum period here:

brainly.com/question/34232134

#SPJ11

Which term best describes a body of law based on custom and general principles, operating through the use of individual cases as precedents for future decisions?

Answers

The term that best describes a body of law based on custom and general principles, operating through the use of individual cases as precedents for future decisions would be common law. It  is a rule set in a prior legal case that is either binding on, or persuasive, for a court, or other tribunal, when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.

Answer:D.

Explanation:the answer would be common law

4. How did nationalism affect Europe after the Congress of Vienna and 1815?

Answers

they European countries start to fight with German